Reference no: EM133061762
Question - Case Study Public Sector Accounting in Malaysia Building for the future - Three years ago the government entered into a contract with MMM Berhad to build a community complex at the selected rural area. The idea was to develop an integrated complex that will accommodate classes for the local community, sports arena, a recreation area, laboratories, a library, a mini theatre, a cafeteria, a common, a business centre, consultation and counselling rooms, and offices. Various programs were planned to be carried out at the complex, including career and technical classes, seminars and discussion forums. The project is part of a master plan to expand community centres within the country. The project was supposed to be completed within two years.
At the start of the project, additional plots of lands were acquired because the reserved land was too small for the project. The construction of the complex also faced resistance from squatters. The squatters claimed that they have occupied the land for more than 25 years and have developed sustainable livelihood. Relocation would cause them to lose their current way of life and increase the cost of living. After several meetings that took place over two months, the squatters consented to be relocated. The government agreed to pay each family RM2,500 in an ex-gratia package and RM300 in monthly compensation. Thirty-eight families were then relocated to an apartment complex.
However, the project suffered problems which cause numerous delays and cost overran by our RM3.4 million, resulting in the termination of the contract with MMM Berhad. Another company, HGL Berhad, was then appointed to take over the project. MMM Berhad claimed to have completed 80% of the work and delays were due to late approval of design, delays on the handover of the land and disputes over a variation order. MMM Berhad threatened to sue the government for the damages incurred by the company.
Ten months ago, the statement issued a stop-work order on the project. The state government claimed that the project was an environmental hazard. The clearing of the land to build the complex caused landslides in the nearby villages. The construction was delayed for another month to allow for installation of retaining walls.
Required - Explain how the government should deal with the cost overrun.
Risk of backlash from consumers
: With all this information in hand, Aditi Basu began mulling over the investment case for Harley-Davidson. Would the new strategy turn the company around or expo
|
European call option with strike price
: A 7-month forward price on a stock is $100. The price of a 3-months European call option with strike price of $98 on this forward contract is $5.
|
The digital strategy of the organisation
: The digital strategy of the organisation - including all the other relevant strategies such as content, mobile, social media, user experience, branding etc
|
Explain what investors presumed to be
: 1. Explain why manager/stock selection is the least important part of the investment process, but the most time consuming for investors
|
How the government should deal with the cost overrun
: Ten months ago, the statement issued a stop-work order on the project. Explain how the government should deal with the cost overrun
|
Explain what is meant by diversification
: 1. Do investors, individually, behave rationally? 2. Explain what is meant by diversification
|
Determine the company gross profit percent
: Question - A company has a net sales of $658,100 and cost of goods sold of $421,184. Determine the company's gross profit percent
|
Modified internal rate of return
: Investments X and Y are mutually exclusive and have an initial cost of $100,000 each. Investments X provides cash inflows of $35,000 a year for three years whil
|
How much cash was received from the disposal of machinery
: Opening balance of machinery account $500,000. How much cash was received from the disposal of machinery
|