KNOWLEDGE BASE Was proper background information on the topic given? - - - - - Was the material selected for presentation appropriate to the topic? - - - - - Was enough essential information given to allow the audience to effectively - - - - - evaluate the topic? Was irrelevant or filler information excluded? - - - - - Did the presenter have a clear understanding of the material presented? - - - - - CRITICL THINKING Were the main issues in this area clearly identified? - - - - - Were both theoretical positions and empirical evidence presented? - - - - - Were the strengths and weaknesses of these theories, and the methods used to - - - - - gather this evidence adequately explained? Did the presenter make recommendations for further work in this area? - - - - - Did the main conclusions of the presentation follow from the material presented? - - - - - Were competing explanations or theories considered and dealt with properly? - - - - - OVERALL IMPRESSION _______/ 15

Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations Poor Excellent PRESENTATION SKILLS 1 2 3 4 5 Were the main ideas presented in an orderly and clear manner? ? ? ? ? ? Did the presentation fill the time allotted? ? ? ? ? ? Were the overheads/handouts appropriate and helpful to the audience? ? ? ? ? ? Did the talk maintain the interest of the audience? ? ? ? ? ? Was there a theme or take-home message to the presentation? ? ? ? ? ? Was the presenter responsive to audience questions? ? ? ? ? ?

Report Structural and Format • The report structure is consistent throughout and easy to follow. ? • The report’s format is at high- quality standard including heading styles, fonts, margins, etc. ? • Assignment structure is consistent. ? • The assignment’s format is at good standard ? • Many departures from required report structure. Integrated Knowledge • Strong evidence of original thinking; good organization, capacity to analyze and synthesize; superior grasp of subject matter; evidence of extensive knowledge base. • Evidence of grasp of subject, some evidence of critical capacity and analytic ability; reasonable understanding of issues; evidence of familiarity with literature. • Little evidence of familiarity with the subject matter; weakness in critical and analytic skills.

Elements Distinguished (5-4) Good (4-2) Unsatisfactory (1-0) Score Review Project Management Software • Definition and software/tool working mechanism are presented clearly. • The advantages of the chosen software have been identified. • Definition and software/tool working mechanism are presented to acceptable extends. ? • The advantages of the chosen software have been clearly identified. ? • Definition and working mechanism are not presented. • The advantages of the chosen templates are unacceptable. Executing tools to test the software • Consistently used time wisely to complete assignment tasks/activities. ? • Usually used time wisely to?complete assignment tasks/activities but may have delayed occasionally. ? • Sometimes used time wisely but usually delayed in completing assignment tasks/activities