How should the court rule on poverty points motion

Assignment Help Operation Management

Reference no: EM131934012

Assignment - Law and Ethics

Raul Leal, the owner and operator of Texas Labor Contractors in East Texas, contacted Poverty Point Produce, Inc., which operates a sweet potato farm in Louisiana, and offered to provide field workers.

Poverty Point accepted the offer. Poverty Point told Leal the number of workers needed and gave him forms for them to fill out and sign.

Leal placed an ad in a newspaper in Brownsville, Texas. Job applicants were directed to Leal's car dealership in Texas where they were told the details of the work. Leal recruited, among others, Elias Moreno, who lives in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas, and transported Moreno and the others to Poverty Point's farm in Louisiana. When the job was done, the workers were returned to Texas.

All of the meetings between Poverty Point and Leal occurred in Louisiana. All of the farm work was done in Louisiana. Poverty Point has no offices, bank accounts, or phone listings in Texas. It does not advertise or solicit business in Texas.

Moreno filed a lawsuit in a federal district court in Texas against Poverty Point, alleging violations of labor law related to his recruitment, transportation, and work. Poverty Point filed a motion to dismiss the suit on the ground that the court in Texas did not have personal jurisdiction over Poverty Point.

I. Who were the parties to this case?

a. Plaintiff:

b. Defendant:

2. Who was Raul Leal? What did he do?

3. Which state was the plaintiff from? (highlight one) Texas Louisiana

4. Which state was the defendant from? (highlight one) Texas Louisiana

5. Where was the lawsuit filed? (highlight one) Texas Louisiana

6. What argument can be made that Poverty Point is not subject to personal jurisdiction in the court in Texas?

7. What argument can be made that Poverty Point is subject to personal jurisdiction in the court in Texas?

8. Consider the purpose of the law on personal jurisdiction over nonresident corporate or business defendants. Did Poverty Point take advantage of an opportunity to do business in Texas? Explain.

9. How should the court rule on Poverty Point's motion? (highlight one)

a. Grant the motion to dismiss because the court does not have personal jurisdiction over Poverty Point

b. Deny the motion to dismiss because the court has personal jurisdiction over Poverty Point.

Reference no: EM131934012

Questions Cloud

Compute your profit per dollar invested : However what if E(rA) = 25%? There is an arbitrage here. What do you do to take advantage of the arbitrage? What do you sell and buy?

Describe the accountability relationships in place at tesco : Assignment Question - Describe the accountability relationships in place at Tesco at the time when this incident occurred and afterwards

Find what is the apr of the loan : If the loan will be paid off over the next 77 months, what is the APR of the loan? (Round your answer as directed, but do not use rounded numbers.

Mike wants to save tax when he sells sl : ADMS 4561 - Mike wants to save tax when he sells SL to the public company and wants to know whether he should sell the SL shares before or after he moves

How should the court rule on poverty points motion : What argument can be made that Poverty Point is not subject to personal jurisdiction in the court in Texas?

Establish a replicating portfolio for the option : An Arbitrage Opportunity. Based on your analysis, you have determined that a particular stock will either increase by 50% or decrease by 50% in one year.

Find market rate of interest associated with perpetuity : Arnold buys a perpetuity for his daughter that pays $1311/year and costs him $14,713.80. What is the market rate of interest associated with this perpetuity?

Some combination of the two : You plan to invest in Stock X, Stock Y, or some combination of the two. determine the betas of stock X and stock Y.

Evaluate the npv of the project : Production of the implants will require $1,840,000 in net working capital to start and additional net working capital investments each year equal to 20 percent.

User Account

All Pages