Reference no: EM13790022
Discussion Question 1
As you prepare to write your first discussion for this week, take a few moments to do the following:
1. Watch Models of Non-Fiction Writing: Presenting an Argument in the AU Library's Films on Demand database
2. Watch Evidence in Argument: Critical Thinkingin the AU Library's Films on Demand database
3. Review supplemental, "An Introduction to Argument"
4. Review the grading rubric for this discussion
Before drafting your initial post, take time to reflect on the structure of a successful argument. Think about the structure of an argument and how it may relate to your paper. Decide what approach will be best suited to your specific argument
In 200 to 300 words, present a plan for the argument you will be presenting in your paper. In a few sentences each, identify and explain the following items for your specific argument:
1. Ethos, pathos, and logos
2. Thesis statement (the paper's position), based upon feedback from last week
3. At least two claims, building upon last week's research and assignment
4. At least one counterargument and ideas for rebuttal
5. Questions or concerns regarding the development of your argument
Discussion Question 2
As you prepare to write your second discussion for this week, take a few moments to do the following:
1. Review the Ashford Writing Center (AWC)articles on
a. Good Paragraph Development: As Easy as P.I.E.
b. Essay Structure
c. Guidelines for Paraphrasing Sources
d. Integrating Quotes.
2. Review the grading rubric for this discussion
3. In 200 to 300 words, share a rough draft of one of your paper's body paragraphs. Your paragraph must include a topic sentence, one direct quote, and one paraphrased passage. Integrate both of these elements into your paragraph using proper APA in-text citations. Below your body paragraph, provide the original text that you are paraphrasing and label it clearly as "Original Source Text." Include an APA-formatted reference list for the sources noted in the body of your paragraph.
4. In a separate paragraph,
a. Explain how your topic sentence supports your thesis statement.
b. Explain how the quoted and paraphrased material supports your claims and/or adds credibility to your writing.
Discuss process you use to write literary analysis for draft
: Discuss the process you used to write the literary analysis for the rough draft assignment.
|
Advantages and disadvantages of using forensic tools
: What is 1 example of a way in which an investigation can be corrupted by not using computer forensics tools?
|
Concerns with properly controlling flow
: Explain this use in your current place of employment or an organization you are familiar with. Describe concerns with properly controlling this flow, including keeping it safe from unauthorized use.
|
Selection and description of organization
: Select a business organization from the Fortune 500 which is of interest to you and ensure that you will be able to obtain the necessary information about its strategy, business model, and performance (much of this information can be obtained from..
|
How quoted material supports your claims and your writing
: Explain how the quoted and paraphrased material supports your claims and/or adds credibility to your writing.
|
Problems related to biomes and diversity
: Should humans strive to preserve a representative sample of all biomes or aquatic zones?
|
Installment-sales computations and entries
: Presented below is summarized information for Johnston Co., which sells merchandise on the installment basis. 2014 2015 2016 Sales (on installment plan) $250,000 $260,000 $280,000 Cost of sales 155,000 163,800 182,000 Gross profit $ 95,000 $ 96,20..
|
What is the net advantage to leasing
: The lease terms, which include maintenance, call for a $10,000 lease payment (4 payments total) at the beginning of each year. DTC's tax rate is 40%. What is the net advantage to leasing? (Note: Assume MACRS rates for Years 1 to 4 are 0.3333, 0.44..
|
Case- muncy v city of dallas
: Prepare case brief of givev case using given guidelines. Case: Muncy v. City of Dallas, 335 F.3d 394 (5th Cir.2003)
|