Reference no: EM133797011
Assignment: Research & Summaries
Complete and submit Part 2: Evaluability Assessment and Logic Model and Part 3: Evaluation Questions of the Program Evaluation Plan Template. This portion of the Program Evaluation Plan asks you to complete an evaluability assessment of the program, create a logic model, and develop evaluation questions.
Introduction
Note: The site and program you choose for this assessment will continue through Assessment 4. You should complete the course assessments in sequential order. You will use the Program Evaluation Plan Template for each assessment as you build your plan. You will be able to refine your responses in the template as you progress through each segment. Get the instant assignment help.
Assessment 2 builds on the work you did in Part 1 of the Program Evaluation Plan, identifying the organization's characteristics and programs that could serve as the basis of the program evaluation. Not every program is ready for evaluation. Many factors can impact the evaluability of programs, including the age of the program, how much data has been generated by the program's outcomes, the expense of the evaluation process, the time and energy of the employees who will conduct the evaluation process, and other issues. As you begin a program evaluation, you must determine whether the program evaluation can return reliable results. Part 2 of the Program Evaluation Plan includes completion of the Evaluability Assessment and the creation of a Logic Model. Part 3 includes the development of evaluation questions that address the purpose of your program evaluation, including your rationale and prioritization of those questions.
Overview
For this assessment, you will complete and submit Part 2 and Part 3 of the Program Evaluation Plan Template.
Instructions
Complete and submit the following parts of the Program Evaluation Plan Template. Continue using the Program Evaluation Plan Template you began in Assessment 1.
Part 2: Evaluability Assessment and Logic Model.
Part 3: Evaluation Questions.
Part 2: Evaluability Assessment and Logic Model
Evaluability Assessment
For this component, consider the evaluability of the program you have chosen to focus on. As we have discussed, Wholey (1979) advocated for the use of evaluability assessments to save costs. Follow the instructions for Part 2 in the Program Evaluation Plan Template to complete the Evaluability Assessment. As you do so, consider the organizational climate and merit of the recommendation that the organization undertake a full program evaluation plan. Ideally, you have chosen a program that is ready for a program evaluation, as you will need to consider what resources, data, and collaboration you would require to conduct a full evaluation. You may choose to have a discussion with your administrator to gather needed information to complete the template; however, you are not required to gather any data or evidence beyond that which is readily available. Your sole outcome in this assessment is to render a recommendation that the program quality is such that it warrants a program evaluation.
Logic Model
You have deepened your understanding of the program you chose for the course project by conducting the Evaluability Assessment (including document review and possible consultation with the program's sponsor, participants, and/or stakeholders). Based on what you know now, follow the instructions for Part 2 in the Program Evaluation Plan Template to construct a logic model of the program using the Logic Model Development table (from page 54 of the Kellogg Foundation's Logic Model Development Guide [PDF] Download Logic Model Development Guide [PDF]), and provide a detailed explanation of the model.
Part 3: Evaluation Questions
Follow the instructions for Part 3 in the Program Evaluation Plan Template to complete the Evaluation Planning Template (from page 59 of the Kellogg Foundation's Logic Model Development Guide [PDF]). Then, in the Program Evaluation Plan Template, write several paragraphs that address the following:
Whether your program evaluation purpose is formative, process oriented, summative, or possibly serves formative and summative needs.
Explain your decision.
How you would prioritize your questions (and/or the scope of your evaluation).
Understanding of contemporary business and corporations law
: CLWM4000 Business and Corporations Law, Kaplan Business School - Describe the key specific areas of law that regulate commerce in Australia
|
What might be some risks associated with this type of open
: Read and reflect on the assigned readings. What might be some risks associated with this type of open communication?
|
Identify any potential health-related risks
: Identify any potential health-related risks, based on the patient's age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting, which should be taken into consideration.
|
What are the phases of a qi project
: What are the phases of a QI project? Provide a brief description of each phase. What qualities or characteristics would you expect from members of a QI team?
|
How much data has been generated by the programs outcomes
: Many factors can impact the evaluability of programs, including the age of the program, how much data has been generated by the program's outcomes.
|
Clinical interviews-medical and psychiatric history
: The patient's self-report, clinical interviews, medical and psychiatric history, observations of behavior and appearance, supplementary information
|
What are ethical and scientific integrity issues
: What are the philosophical, theoretical, and methodological perspectives in research articles that were chosen? What are ethical and scientific integrity issues
|
Identify potential disaster likely to impact your community
: Identify a potential disaster likely to impact your community or region. Evaluate available trauma assets, emergency management services, hospitals, clinics
|
Important components of the psychiatric interview
: Write a brief explanation of three important components of the psychiatric interview and why you consider these elements important.
|