Reference no: EM133430020
Questions: We regularly encounter arguments in statistical forms and see the immediate utility in this component of critical thinking. We need to be careful so as not to conclude that all statistics are equally flawed. We don't want to give the impression that because statistical arguments are often imperfect, they are worthless. With this introduction, please briefly respond to each question [max 200 words each]; 2 pts each:
Q1: Why are absolute numbers and percentages, when one is presented without the other, so often misleading?
Q2: Compare the mean, mode, and median. When is each one most appropriately used?
Q3: What are some steps that you can take to avoid being deceived by statistics that you encounter?
Q4: Discuss factors that might influence how a communicator, such as a newspaper reporter or a television analyst, decides to present a set of statistics. Relate your answer to the textbook's reference to "backward reasoning."
A reminder that because people often associate strong feelings with their opinions, they will resort to "Backward Reasoning." They will hunt for reasons to support their strong opinions such that their conclusions determine which reasons they consider.
Q5: Provide an example of an actual current article to support your answer in (Q4). Be sure to describe the example and reference it properly briefly.
Questions: Provide a concise answer for each of the following discussion questions:
Q1. Differentiate among the major kinds of evidence discussed in chapter 7.
Q2. Discuss the major problems of each of the kinds of evidence and indicate any situations in which you think such evidence might be persuasive in an argument.
Q3. What criteria should you use to decide how much credibility to give to an authority's conclusions?