Others This is a MBA subject that you will find in Assessment outline. Though I have mentioned it in Operations Management because I am not sure which topic it comes under. Here comes anothe assignment in which a report has to be presented. You will find all the details in the assignment outline. The assignment format is also given in the same. The whole assignment should be written in simple English with Harvard Referencing Style and the References should be genuine. I want the assignment before 6:00 pm( Australian Time) on Monday 10th Dec. This is the easy assignment you will find. The content should be highly relevant. 5 references are to be added with In Text and End Of The Text.

Recommendations (5 marks) Recommendations are lacking credibility, are difficult to understand, and are barely supported by research. Recommendations are present but limited, and conveyed with only just enough empirical support. Recommendations are presented but there is scope for improvement in terms of wording and empirical support. Recommendations are strong, backed by sufficient research, but could be worded more convincingly. Recommendations are articulately and compellingly worded, and are justified by references to theory.

Engagement-related initiatives (5 marks) The initiatives are either missing or not related to engagement, neither are they supported by research. The initiatives and supporting research are presented, but they are not convincing or well connected. Whilst improvement is needed, there is a solid attempt at linking the initiatives with the relevant theories. The initiatives and evidence are of a high standard but would be more convincing if worded more clearly. There is no doubt, by the way the initiatives and evidence are presented, that these would be a success.

Culture-related initiatives (5 marks) The initiatives and type of culture are either not present or inaccurate. The effort is below that of a postgrad standard. Only limited details are provided on the type of culture and initiatives, and improvements to wording are needed. The initiatives and type of culture are solid but could be communicated in a more articulate and synthesised manner. The initiatives and type of culture are excellent, connected and worded well. Only minor improvements needed. The initiatives and type of culture are not only accurate and expertly worded but also supported by research.

Performance-related initiatives (5 marks) The initiatives and measures are either not present or not related to staff performance. Initiatives and measures are present but are neither clearly linked nor worded articulately. Linkages between the initiatives and measures are obvious but could be better explicated. The initiatives and measures are explicitly connected and are worded in a clear and professional manner. The initiatives and measures are not only connected and well worded but also supported by research.

Criterion Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction Overall structure (5 marks) The intro, conclusion and/or referencing are either missing or have failed to meet the minimum standards of postgraduate study. Intro and conclusion are minimal but sufficient, and referencing is present but limited. Major improvements needed. Intro and conclusion are very good but could be more comprehensive. Referencing is fine but inconsistencies exist. Impressive attempts are obvious in terms of the intro, conclusion and referencing, but there is scope for some improvement. The intro clearly states the aims and structure; the conclusion is a solid summary; and Harvard referencing is used correctly.