Reference no: EM133306857
Question 1. Is the information in the website plausible? Does it seem reasonable, given what else is known in science and from other authoritative sources?
Question 2. Is the presentation of information objective or is it slanted, biased, or designed to arouse your emotions?
Question 3. Is there a conflict of interest?
Question 4. Are the claims moderate, or are they extreme and inconsistent with what is known from psychological science and science in general?
Question 5. Are the claims consistent, or do they contradict each other?
1. Are sources, references, or bibliographic citations listed? Was research published in a reputable, peer-reviewed scientific journal?
2. Which type of evidence, if any, is offered in support of a claim? Statement of authority? Anecdotes? Scientific research, such as case studies, correlation studies, quasi-experiments, or true experiments?
3. How good is the evidence provided? Was it based on carefully and systematically made observations under controlled conditions? Was it done by independent scientists at, say, a university, or was it funded by a company or other interested party?
Summarize your analysis and explain why the mock website is high, moderate, or low in quality.