Reference no: EM133178451

Question - EZ Clean-Up Inc. (EZ Clean-Up or the "Company") provides various set-up, tear-down, and clean-up services to party-planning businesses as well as various third-party customers.

The Company entered into a contract with The Function Junction LLC to be the sole provider of its services for all its events for a period of three years. The Function Junction holds weekly events, with EZ Clean-Up providing its services for every event. After the initial three-year period, the contract is renewable in one-year increments. The average customer relationship period typically lasts five years (the initial three-year term plus two one-year renewals). The Company accounts for the arrangement as a contract with a customer within the scope of ASC 606.

As an incentive to execute new customer contracts, the Company offers its sales representative a one-time $5,000 commission, which is earned and payable to the sales representative as soon as the contract is executed with the customer. No additional commission is paid to the sales representative upon renewal of the contract by the customer.

Before winning the contract, the sales representative incurred $500 in travel costs to travel to The Function Junction's headquarters to perform a demonstration.

EZ Clean-Up incurred approximately $2,000 in external legal costs to draft the contract executed between the Company and The Function Junction.

Required -

1. Under US GAAP, how should EZ Clean-Up treat incremental costs of obtaining a contract? Please answer the same question under IFRS/IAS.

2. According to US GAAP, which costs in this case are incremental costs of obtaining the contract, and therefore are required to be capitalized?

3. According to US GAAP, how should EZ Clean-Up determine the appropriate amortization method, and over what period should the Company amortize any capitalized costs?

4. According to US GAAP, what disclosures should EZ Clean-Up provide in its financial statements?