Reference no: EM133509031
Assignment:
An ethical dilemma refers to a situation in which an individual or group faces a moral or ethical conflict, where they have to choose between two or more morally acceptable but mutually exclusive options. For example,
A patient with a terminal illness, who has been suffering for years, expresses a strong desire to end their life. The physician is torn between respecting the patient's autonomy and right to die with dignity, and adhering to their professional obligation to preserve life and provide care. On one hand, honoring the patient's wishes could alleviate their suffering and respect their autonomy. However, on the other hand, the medical professional may feel conflicted about the sanctity of life and the potential consequences of assisting in ending a life, which could clash with their moral and religious beliefs.
The physician must carefully weigh the potential benefits of honoring the patient's request against the ethical and legal implications, as well as the emotional toll it may take on both the patient and themselves. This complex dilemma forces the medical professional to navigate the delicate balance between patient autonomy, the preservation of life, and their own personal and professional values, illustrating the multifaceted nature of ethical decision making in healthcare
In approaching the aforementioned ethical dilemma, let's consider how the ethical theory of utilitarianism could offer a solution. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist approach that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of individuals. In this context, a utilitarian perspective would prioritize the reduction of suffering and the promotion of the greatest amount of overall well-being.
From an utilitarian standpoint, the medical professional would carefully assess the potential outcomes of both options. If the patient's suffering is deemed to be unbearable and their quality of life severely compromised, assisting in their end-of-life request could be justified. By honoring the patient's autonomy and alleviating their pain, the overall well-being of the patient could be enhanced, resulting in a reduction in suffering.
However, it is important to note that the utilitarian approach would require considering the potential consequences beyond the immediate situation. This might include evaluating the impact on the patient's loved ones and the broader societal implications of allowing such actions. A utilitarian decision would involve weighing the overall happiness and well-being of all stakeholders involved, aiming to maximize the overall utility or benefit.
Ultimately, utilitarianism offers a framework for ethical decision-making that prioritizes the greatest good for the greatest number of people. In the given dilemma, it would guide the medical professional towards a course of action that minimizes suffering and maximizes overall well-being, taking into account the potential consequences for all individuals involved.