This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critique of the Evidence Discussion of your overall impression of the quality of the evidence (refer to the critique gidelines in the Melnyk book). Synthesized 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Gaps in the Evidence What is missing from the evidence? What areas need further study? 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Comparison To Your Own Practice How does what you found in the evidence (specific findings) align with your own experience/practice? Feasibility of changing practice, if warranted? Barriers to changing practice? 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion Restate key points from synthesis; implications for practice/research. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Spelling, Grammar, and Editing 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Topic sentences, clarify, logical flow, development/coherence, and paraphrasing/quotes. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format Title page, headings, citations in text, references, and copies of articles included.

Note: Refer to the details in Literature Review Project Overview and Timeline within Week One Assignments. Similarity Score After submitting your assignment, select Submission Details to view your similarity score. Your similarity score will appear as a percentage next to your submitted file. It may take up to 24 hours to view your similarity score. Rubric Final Paper Rubric Final Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction and Search History 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Integration/Synthesis of the Evidence Present 3 "themes" across the studies (Similarities in results? Dissimilarities of results?). Within each theme, present the evidence from the studies. 45.0 pts