Reference no: EM13499384
1.Calculate Ideko’s unlevered cost of capital when Ideko’s unlevered beta is 1.1 rather than 1.2,and all other required estimates are the same as in the chapter.
2.Calculate Ideko’s unlevered cost of capital when the market risk premium is 6% rather than 5%, the risk-free rate is 5% rather than 4%, and all other required estimates are the same as in the chapter.
3.Using the information produced in the income statement in Problem 4, use EBITDA as a multiple to estimate the continuation value in 2010, assuming the current value remains unchanged (reproduce Table 19.15). Infer the EV/sales and the unlevered and levered P/E ratios implied by the continuation value you calculated.
4.How does the assumption on future improvements in working capital affect your answer to Problem 13?
5.Approximately what expected future long-run growth rate would provide the same EBITDA multiple in 2010 as Ideko has today (i.e., 9.1)? Assume that the future debt-to-value ratio is held constant at 40%; the debt cost of capital is 6.8%; Ideko’s market share will increase by 0.5% per year until 2010; investment, financing, and depreciation will be adjusted accordingly; and the projected improvements in working capital occur (i.e., the assumptions in Problem 5).
6.Approximately what expected future long-run growth rate would provide the same EBITDA multiple in 2010 as Ideko has today (i.e., 9.1). Assume that the future debt-to-value ratio is held constant at 40%; the debt cost of capital is 6.8%; Ideko’s market share will increase by 0.5% per year; investment, financing, and depreciation will be adjusted accordingly; and the projected improvements in working capital do not occur (i.e., the assumptions in Problem 6).
7.Using the APV method, estimate the value of Ideko and the NPV of the deal using the continuation value you calculated in Problem 13 and the unlevered cost of capital estimate in Section 19.4. Assume that the debt cost of capital is 6.8%; Ideko’s market share will increase by 0.5% per year until 2010; investment, financing, and depreciation will be adjusted accordingly; and the projected improvements in working capital occur (i.e., the assumptions in Problem 5).
8.Using the APV method, estimate the value of Ideko and the NPV of the deal using the continuation value you calculated in Problem 13 and the unlevered cost of capital estimate in Section 19.4. Assume that the debt cost of capital is 6.8%; Ideko’s market share will increase by 0.5% per year; investment, financing, and depreciation will be adjusted accordingly; and the projected improvements in working capital do not occur (i.e., the assumptions in Problem 6).
9.Use your answers from Problems 17 and 18 to infer the value today of the projected improvements in working capital under the assumptions that Ideko’s market share will increase by 0.5% per year and that investment, financing, and depreciation will be adjusted accordingly.
|
What is this rate for the period under the study
: The natural rate of capacity utilization is defined as the rate at which Y is zero. What is this rate for the period under the study?
|
|
What is the lowest possible strike price it could have
: Suppose the S&P 500 is at 900, and it will pay a dividend of $30 at the end of the year. Suppose the interest rate is 2%. If a one-year European put option has a negative time value, what is the lowest possible strike price it could have?
|
|
What is the maximum possible price of a put option on
: Consider the July 2009 IBM call and put options in Problem 3. Ignoring the negligible interest you might earn on TBills over the remaining few days’ life of the options, show that there is no arbitrage opportunity using put-call parity for the option..
|
|
What position has more downside exposure: a short position
: What position has more downside exposure: a short position in a call or a short position in a put? That is, in the worst case, in which of these two positions would your losses be greater?
|
|
How does the assumption on future improvements in working
: .Approximately what expected future long-run growth rate would provide the same EBITDA multiple in 2010 as Ideko has today (i.e., 9.1). Assume that the future debt-to-value ratio is held constant at 40%; the debt cost of capital is 6.8%; Ideko’s mark..
|
|
What production capacity will ideko require each year
: Under the assumptions that Ideko’s market share will increase by 0.5% per year (implying that the investment, financing, and depreciation will be adjusted as described in Problems 3 and 4) but that the projected improvements in net working capital do..
|
|
What will gartners levered value be in this case
: Suppose instead Gartner decides to maintain a 50% debt-to-value ratio going forward. If Gartner’s debt cost of capital is 6.67%, what will Gartner’s levered value be in this case?
|
|
What is the present value of the interest tax shield
: Looking over the spreadsheet, you realize that while all of the cash flow estimates are correct, your associate used the flow-to-equity valuation method and discounted the cash flows using the company’s equity cost of capital of 11%. However, the pro..
|
|
Conduct a sensitivity analysis of the npv
: Do a sensitivity analysis assuming that variable production costs vary between $18 and $25, while the sale price varies between $43 and $52. Solve below, including steps and formulas-Conduct a sensitivity analysis of the NPV in which sales growth ..
|