Reference no: EM132916128
The case of W.T. Grant is a classic in cash flow analysis. During the 1960s and 1970s, Grant was one of the largest retailers in the United States, with more than 1,200 store nationwide. Grant was a stable New York Stock Exchange firm that had paid cash dividends every year since 1907. However, the inability of Grant's operations to generate positive cash flow indicated the existence of serious problems. From 1966 through 1973, while Grant's net income was steady at about $35 million per year, cash flow from operations was negative in every year except 1968 and 1969, and even in those years the positive cash flow generated was insignificant in amount. The results for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1973, are the most striking. Net income for the year was $38 million. A frequently used measure of "cash flow" (net income and depreciation) suggested that W.T. Grant's operations generated $48 million in cash. However, actual cash flow generated by operations for the year was negative $120 million. In October 1975, Grant filed for bankruptcy, and by early 1976, the company was liquidated and ceased to exist.
Question 1) Does your company use the direct method or the indirect method? Explain.
Question 2) Analyze your company's overall cash flow picture for the three most recent periods in light of the positive or negative cash flow patterns for the three categories of cash flows.
Question 3) How does your company define cash and cash equivalents?
Question 4) What is the largest dollar item in the Operating Activities section of your company's statement of cash flows? Explain exactly what is represented in this item.
Question 5) Companies often compute earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). This number is used as an approximation of operating cash flow before interest and taxes. Using the information in your company's income statement and statement of cash flows, compute EBITDA for the most recent period.