How do you think the court responded to morris appeal

Assignment Help Project Management

Reference no: EM131272865

Howard Wein had an agreement with property owner Jack Morris regarding payment of a commission for bringing possible future tenants to view Morris's property. Allegedly, Morris himself eventually found tenants directly and leased his properties without acknowledging or paying Wein. Wein in turn brought suit against Morris, claiming that their agreement was illegally terminated and his business relationships with the possible tenants were interfered with.

However, the commission agreement between Wein and Morris contained arbitration clauses. Both Wein and Morris went to court and, although the litigation lasted five years, neither party ultimately favored arbitration. However, the judge (ignoring the objections of both parties) demanded arbitration and dismissed the lawsuit. Both parties then engaged in arbitration and Wein was awarded his commissions.

Subsequently, Morris appealed, stating that the court's decision regarding arbitration ought to be reversed because both parties had waived their right to arbitration. How do you think the court responded to Morris's appeal? Does the arbitration still stand even though the parties originally waived arbitration?

Wein v. Morris, 388 N.J. Super 640 (App. Div. 2006).

Reference no: EM131272865

Questions Cloud

What are the legal analogies roberts makes : Chief Justice Roberts's opinion relies on drawing several legal analogies to compare and contrast United Haulers with other cases. What are the legal analogies Roberts makes? Are the legal analogies appropriate?

Do you think these three clauses are unconscionable : The losing party would pay all attorneys fees, and there was no right to a jury trial. Do you think these three clauses are unconscionable? How do you think the court decided?

Examine the major benefits that this report can provide : Examine the major benefits that this report can provide for the organization, and suggest two uses for the information contained therein. Justify your response.

Discuss about the critical thinking : Discuss about the Critical thinking and To obtain and retain the best and the brightest talent in an industry, an organization should pay particular attention to its compensation practices.

How do you think the court responded to morris appeal : How do you think the court responded to Morris's appeal? Does the arbitration still stand even though the parties originally waived arbitration?

Identify how various health care stakeholders define quality : Analyze the purpose of quality management in the health care industry. Identify how various health care stakeholders define quality. Identify roles in health care related to Quality Improvement.

Did the parties have to settle through arbitration : When Ally Cat attempted to bring Chauvin to court for damages, how do you think the court resolved the dispute? Did the parties have to settle through arbitration?

Discuss your vision of nursing in your community : Compare and contrast your own vision for the future of health care with what is currently occurring. Discuss your vision of nursing in your community, the nation, and the world or What trends do you see impacting health care and the role of the profe..

What reasoning did the court use to come to that decision : ingh and Janda argued that the contract was unconscionable, and they should not be required to arbitrate. The U.S. District Court found that the contract was unconscionable. What reasoning did the court use to come to that decision?

User Account

All Pages