Reference no: EM133563266
Question: It is very typical for leaders and their staff to explore market capabilities when looking for viable and feasible partners who provide health technology solutions. When examining vendor products, be they software, hardware, or other technologies, it is essential to read the vendor sales literature and objective industry analysis. This process is collaborative and has many dimensions, including looking at the technical, financial, and functional aspects of technology solutions.
As a healthcare administrator, you will collaborate with other leaders such as CIOs, operations managers, CFOs, and CMOs to analyze Health Information Technology (HIT) vendor software solutions. Keeping in mind both the tactical problems your organization is facing and your organization's overall strategic direction, you will analyze vendors in the marketplace and the HIT products they sell.
For this two-part Assignment, analyze vendors who compete in the HIT software marketplace using the Independent Physician Office Ambulatory EMR Scenario in your Learning Resources. After assessing the capabilities and limitations of at least three possible vendor solutions for Part 2, you will recommend to your leadership team colleagues which one or two vendors you would feel most comfortable progressing toward the next steps of system acquisition. Keep in mind that choosing two solutions allows the organization to have potential leverage in negotiations. If your recommendation is one vendor, how do you justify this recommendation?
Review the Independent Physician Office Scenario in your Learning Resources.
Select three vendors after reviewing the HealthIT.gov list and the KLAS reports in the Learning Resources.
The Assignment-Part 1: Compare and contrast the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of three vendors offering an ambulatory Electronic Health Record to independent physician practices. Construct a table that summarizes your SWOT analysis with an accompanying reference page listing any external resources used in your analysis. Comparisons should include quantitative/evidence-based information as well as qualitative.