Reference no: EM133428359
Your answers to the prompts below should be based on the reading and discussion of the article "Rebranding Bilingualism: The shifting discourses of language education policy in California's 2016 election" (Katznelson & Bernstein, 2017). KEEP YOUR ANSWERS BRIEF, BUT USE FULL SENTENCES.
a. What was the general goal/effect of California's Prop. 227 in 1998? (What did it do? A single sentence or two is fine!)
b. How did the wording used by the writers of Prop. 227 present bilingual education to voters? Positively? Negatively? Give at least one example.
c. As discussed in this course, identify at least one historical factor or ideology that the authors feel was significant in the writing and passing of Prop 227 in California at this time. Consider: Why was it written? What were people reacting to?
d. What was the general goal/effect of California's Prop. 58 in 2016? (What did it do? A single sentence or two is fine!)
d. How did the wording of Prop. 58 present bilingual education to voters?
e. As discussed in this course, what ideology is reflected in this new framing of bilingual education?