Reference no: EM133632137
Finance
Activity 1: Group Case Study
You must form groups of 4 to 5 members before Week 12.
All questions for the group case study are based on the article on the following page.
You will complete the questions in your group, but only one group member needs to submit the final answers (for the entire group).
Activity 2: Individual Test
The individual test will take place after the group case study. The test will consist of short answer questions and multiple choice questions.
Are dividends more important than earnings for stock valuation?
Kiryll Prakapenka, Fat Tail Investment Research, 5 July 2023
Last week, I ragged on earnings per share (EPS). Today, I want to be more constructive. If we shouldn't rely on EPS for valuation, what should we rely on? If not EPS, then what? How about dividends?
Cash is fact, profit an opinion
Over three decades ago, economist Alfred Rappaport wrote the classic Creating Shareholder Value. In it, Rappaport wrote that cash is a fact, profit an opinion.
So if cash is more informative than earnings, how can investors use cash flows to improve their stock analysis?
A hasty way is to overcome the unreliability of EPS by tethering earnings to cash flow. Anchor earnings to cash and see if you can spot any suspicious divergence. High profits and a low tax charge may mean that profits are not what they seem.
We can go beyond using cash flows as a check on earnings, however. Cash can be used as the key input to value stocks.
Dividends as proxy for cash flows and value
If cash is a better measure than EPS, we can use dividends per share (DPS) as a proxy for cash flow.
After all, what are dividends if not a company's cash flow accruing to shareholders?
One way to value a stock using dividends is via the dividend discount model (DDM), which calculates the sum of the present value of all future expected dividends issued to shareholders.
The DDM has the following formula:
Stock price = DPS/(r - g)
In the formula:
DPS = expected dividends per share a year from now. r = required rate of return for investors/discount rate.
g = stable, long-term dividends growth rate.
Commonwealth Bank example
Let's use Commonwealth Bank of Australia [ASX:CBA] as an example.
CBA's FY24 DPS is expected to be $4.36 a share.
Using a discount rate of 8% and a (high) stable growth rate of 5%, we get a valuation of $145 a share, well overshooting the current price of around $102. I won't be rushing to buy CBA shares just yet, though. A growth rate of 5% seems excessive for a mature firm like CommBank.
We can work backwards using the formula to figure out what the market's implied growth rate is for the bank:
$102 = $4.36/(8% - g)
Solving for g gets us a stable growth rate as implied by the current price of about 3.7%. More reasonable, but still a bit of a stretch given the lower growth of the Australian economy.
A stock's stable growth rate has to be less than or equal to the growth rate of the economy in which it operates. In the May Statement on Monetary Policy, the Reserve Bank projected GDP growth to be below 2% well into 2025.
Using 2% as a stable growth rate, we get a valuation for CBA of around $73 a share. Using a growth rate of 3%, we get $87.
Clearly, the model is highly susceptible to suggestion. (But the more down-to-earth growth rates do seem to hint the bank's valuation is stretched). Tweak a key input like the growth rate, and the valuation fluctuates.
Pitfalls of the dividend discount model
The dividend discount model has great intuitive appeal. And it references cash flows (via dividends) instead of earnings!
Surely, it's the perfect measure of a stock's value then, right?
Unfortunately, nothing is so straightforward in investing. The model has its downsides. The biggest, already mentioned, is the sensitivity to assumptions.