5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

25.0% Speculation as to how the major models and theories of medical psychology and behavioral health medicine develop within the stages of consultation is not present. Speculation as to how the major models and theories of medical psychology and behavioral health medicine develop within the stages of consultation is present but incomplete. Speculation as to how the major models and theories of medical psychology and behavioral health medicine develop within the stages of consultation exist is present but done at a superficial level. Speculation as to how the major models and theories of medical psychology and behavioral health medicine develop within the stages of consultation is clearly present. Discussion is thoughtful. Research is from scholarly, but some outdated sources. Speculation as to how the major models and theories of medical psychology and behavioral health medicine develop within the stages of consultation is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Research is from scholarly, current sources.

25.0% Evaluation of how theoretical concepts of psychology apply to the different stages of consultation practice that currently exist is not present. Evaluation of how theoretical concepts of psychology apply to the different stages of consultation practice that currently exist is present but incomplete. Evaluation of how theoretical concepts of psychology apply to the different stages of consultation practice that currently exist is present but done at a superficial level. Evaluation of how theoretical concepts of psychology apply to the different stages of consultation practice that currently exist is clearly present. Discussion is thoughtful. Research is from scholarly, but some outdated sources. Evaluation of how theoretical concepts of psychology apply to the different stages of consultation practice that currently exist is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Research is from scholarly, current sources.

Do not use any references more than than 5 years old. Double Spaced, New Roman x12 Left alignment Class Code PCN-805-O500 Stages of the Consultation Process 253.0 Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) 70.0% 20.0% Discussion of what the research says regarding financing, economics, and policies that make for a successful consultation business venture is not present. Discussion of what the research says regarding financing, economics, and policies that make for a successful consultation business venture is present but incomplete. Discussion of what the research says regarding financing, economics, and policies that make for a successful consultation business venture is present but done at a superficial level. Discussion of what the research says regarding financing, economics, and policies that make for a successful consultation business venture is clearly present and thoughtful. Discussion of what the research says regarding financing, economics, and policies that make for a successful consultation business venture is clearly present and insightful.

This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to LopesWrite.