Reference no: EM133324242

Please answer with an explanation.

1) Did the review explicitly address a focused clinical question?

2) Was the search for relevant studies detailed and exhaustive?

3) Was the selection of primary studies reproducible and free from bias?

4) Was the quality of included studies assessed, and were they of a high standard?

5) Are the individual studies adequately described?

6) Were the results of primary studies combined appropriately?

7) How are the results presented and is this appropriate to the data?

8) Are the results discussed in relation to existing knowledge, and is the discussion biased?

9) Does this systematic review answer the clinical question? If yes, how?