Reference no: EM132710729

What are the ethical implications of this case study?
What are the ethical implications of alternative courses of action?
What should we do in this situation and how can we justify that decision?

Analyze the Ethical Dimensions of the Public Health Issue and Context

• There are two public health professionals involved in decision-making in this scenario. Dr. Albert is a social scientist with strong training in conducting research. Dr. Baines is a community worker who focuses on interventions with the community.
• Dr. A wants to use this opportunity as a research study that could generate new information that could be generalized to other communities.
• Dr. B wants to focus their efforts on intervening in their own community rather than spending time on conduction research.
• This intervention would focus on a small subset of their community population, black men who have sex with men. Conducting research would allow them to generalize their findings to a broader population, but would also mean that the subjects in the control group don't get the intervention. Conducting this education as an intervention would mean focusing on all black men who have sex with men within their community, but the outcomes could not be published as a research study that could benefit other communities and populations.

Respond to these questions on your discussion board:

Question 1: As public health professionals, do Dr. Albert and Dr. Baines have ethical obligations to other populations within their community? How about outside the community? Which obligation should be their highest priority, the subset of men who have sex with men, their whole community, or populations outside their community?

Question 2: On what basis is the public health agency justified in advancing interventions that target only a subgroup of the community?