Reference no: EM133263018

1. Highlight the pertinent facts;

2. Identify the issue of law posed by the case problem. This will be in the form of a question based on a legal concept from the chapter.

3. What should be the decision in the case? (i.e. the answer to the issue)?

4. The reasoning for such decision.

1. Jessica Greenan of Centerville, Mass. was a bookkeeper and also handled payroll for a Hyannis company. Over a five-year period between 2014 and 2018, Greenan wired money from the company's bank 536 times to pay her credit card bills totaling $1,135,460. She then doctored the company's bank statements to make the payments to her credit card bills appear like legitimate expenses. After being fired from the Hyannis company, Greenan began work for a Cape Cod construction company in 2018. There she transferred more than $287,000 in company funds and used the money to again pay her own credit card bills. She also used money to make $11,000 in car payments.

2. From 2006 to 2008, on 17 occasions, Andrews asked friends and colleagues to loan him a total of roughly $2 million to purchase property in Indianapolis or to improve property that he owned in the area. He never owned, bought, or improved property In Indianapolis, and primarily used the money to fund a day-trading account with TD Ameritrade.

3. Charlie went to Benson's jewelry store on February 4. He made a purchase and delivered to Benson a check drawn for the sum of eight-five dollars upon a Boxboro bank. At that point in time, he had insufficient funds in or credit with the bank to meet the check in full on presentation. The check was post-dated by two days so that it was not payable until Monday February 6. The check was refused payment due to insufficient funds.