Hearsay is statement that offers evidence

Assignment Help Other Subject
Reference no: EM132713335

1. Hearsay is a statement that offers evidence that proves the truth of the matter in a statement this is besides any statements made by declarant during testifying at trial (Hail, 2014). Hearsay evidence may be deemed inadmissible in a criminal proceeding if a statute or rule does not prove otherwise. For example if Joey is on trial and his friend Brian stands outside the court room stating exactly how Joey is guilty this is hearsay. This evidence would be secondhand and deemed inadmissible which means it serves no use to the trial or court whether this information is true or false. Another form of inadmissible hearsay would be a witness stating her testimony and someone from outside of the court room stating a testimony. This would be inadmissible whether the information is true or false due to them not being an actual witness to the case.

2. Hearsay is a statement that the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and the party offers evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement (Hails, 2018). The rule against using hearsay evidence is to prevent out-of-court, second-hand statements from being used as evidence at trial, given their potential unreliability (FindLaw's Team, 2019). Hearsay evidence may be deemed inadmissible. For example, a couple in Jane's job is going through a divorce. Jane heard a rumor from her coworkers that Joe was unfaithful to his wife but did not have evidence that Joe was unfaithful to his wife. Jane did not observe Joe cheating, nor did Joe tell Jane he was cheating, therefore not having direct knowledge of the affair. Jane would not be able to testify during the divorce proceeding about Joe being unfaithful. Another example, Angel is a witness for a murder trial. Being the first witness, Angel testifies that Liz told him that she saw the defendant kill the case's victim. Liz did not testify at the trial. The statement that Angel made was to show that the defendant killed the victim. It would be considered inadmissible hearsay evidence.

3. Hearsay is when a witness is reciting an out-of-court statement to prove the truth of the issue asserted. For example, a law enforcement officer can be called to stand to verify what the witness said during the interrogation. Hearsay evidence may be inadmissible in a criminal proceeding for many reasons. The first reason being if the witness clearly shows signs that they are mentally or emotionally unstable to make a statement. This is inadmissible because it is not reliable that the statement the witness gives is valid. The second reason is if the witness changes their alibi or the sequence of events when the crime occurred. If the witness keeps changing the story it is not reliable, it just proves that the witness is a liar.

4. Hearsay is a statement which is made outside of the courtroom, brought up in an attempt to prove its assertion. For example, if Johnny testifies in a court of law that he heard his friend Logan tell him that he witnessed a murder carried out by the defendant, but the Logan is not at the trial, this statement is considered hearsay. Because the statement being discussed is made by someone from outside of a courtroom. Another example would be a similar situation in which Johnny testifies the same as he did the first time, but Logan is actually able to testify at the trials. In this situation, the hearsay is admissible.

5. Hearsay is information received from other people that one cannot adequately confirm. From a legal standpoint, it is testimony from a witness under oath who is reciting an out-of-court statement which is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. In most courts, hearsay evidence is inadmissible unless an exception applies.

For example, to prove that Tom was in town, the attorney asks a witness, "What did Susan tell you about Tom being in town?" Since the witness's answer will rely on an out-of-court statement that Susan made, if Susan is unavailable for cross examination, the answer is hearsay. Note, however, that if the attorney asking the same question is not trying to prove the truth of the assertion about Tom being in town but the fact that Susan said the specific words, it may be acceptable. If you're facing a criminal trial, there may be several pieces of evidence that the government is relying on for their case. However, that doesn't mean that the evidence is admissible in court. A skilled criminal defense attorney can challenge questionable evidence, such as hearsay statements, and help you prepare your strongest defense.

Reference no: EM132713335

Questions Cloud

Identifying each item of hearsay evidence : Make a list identifying each item of hearsay evidence that was discovered law enforcement, prosecutor or defense attorney.
What total amount should be reported as current trade : Claim against shipper for goods lost in transit in November 300,000. What total amount should be reported as current trade and other receivables
Techniques are used by criminals to loot savings : What types of techniques are used by criminals to loot savings and loans and insurance operations? Who are the targeted marks (or) victims?
Calculate Baljeet income from employment : Baljeet receives reimbursement of $1,200 for safety equipment and clothing, Calculate Baljeet's income from employment for a semi-monthly pay period
Hearsay is statement that offers evidence : Hearsay is a statement that offers evidence that proves the truth of the matter in statement this is besides any statements made by declarant during testifying
Describe the design of the study : Describe the design of the study. Identify whether the research study is a quantitative or qualitative design.
How much is the amount expensed outright : Cost of changes during construction to make new building more energy efficient 100,000. How much is the amount expensed outright
Explain the policies effects on criminal justice system : Explain how the research influenced the policies' development. Explain the policies' effects on the criminal justice system.
What were the cash proceeds many years later : In 1952 your grandfather left your mother a $5,000 U.S. government bond, to be used for your education. What were the cash proceeds many years later

Reviews

Write a Review

Other Subject Questions & Answers

  The most widely accepted theory of foreign exchange rate

The most widely accepted theory of foreign exchange rate determination is purchasing power parity, yet it has proven to be quite poor.

  Describe the purpose of conducting a utility analysis

Describe the purpose of conducting a utility analysis. What factors influence whether the scientific selection will result in better-performing employees? How do valid predictors increase success ratios? What processes are involved in computing ut..

  How political atmosphere impacts clients

In this module, you learned about social class and sexual identity. Consider how political atmosphere impacts clients and how particular legislation.

  Confidence interval estimate of the true population

(a) Set up a 99% confidence interval estimate of the true population average amount of paint included in a five-litre can. (Use the z-table.) (b) Based on the results of (a), do you think that the store owner has a right to complain to the manufact..

  How do ackerman views on management

How do Ackerman's views on management differ from a secular school's view of behavior management? What biblical concepts challenge you as someone who may be working with students with behavioral disabilities in the future

  Discuss local supermarket uses the slogan

Your local supermarket uses the slogan "It's your store." However, when you asked one of the stock people to help you find a bag of chips

  Explain how do we know that there were floral and faunal

Anthropology- Explain how do we know that there were floral and faunal domesticates in Level 2. Robust bone in ankles and upper bodies Females had more cases of arthritis in knees.

  Compare and contrast safe medication

Compare and contrast safe medication administration for a very young and very old patient.

  Explain the meaning of job order costing

Explain the meaning of Job Order Costing and present live example in manufacturing industries/companies as a case study under the chapter of job order costing.

  Compare the strengths and weaknesses of each system

Governments differ on where the power of the state should be held. Unitary systems concentrate the power within the central government.

  What is the role of state-based action coalitions

What is the role of state-based action coalitions and how do they advance goals of the Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action?

  Identify an amendment that directly impacts the court system

How are these goals similar to each other? How are they different? Do you think the models you selected are effective deterrents?

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd