Reference no: EM133244780

Case analysis 

1. Give a clear and concise explanation of the case at hand.
2. Give a thorough, philosophical exegesis of the relevant aspects of Walzer's and Murray's arguments.
3. Present an argument applying the relevant philosophers to the case at hand. 
4. Present an argument explaining why one of the philosophers can be viewed as offering a more successful solution to the case at hand.
5. Explain what solution you would propose for Rebecca and Jimmy.

Case

Consider Rebecca, a single mother of 4 who has been a long-term welfare recipient.  Rebecca is a weekend meth user who often spends her money on meth.  However, without her welfare money, her children would not have any food or medical treatment and would most likely be placed in foster homes where their lives could go worse than they currently are. Rebecca's yearly welfare application is due.

Now consider Jimmy, a veteran of both Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom.  During the battle, Jimmy was wounded and now suffers from some moderate physical disability and post-traumatic stress.  Sadly, although Jimmy tried to find a job, there weren't many systems in place to help him re-integrate or work through his issues.  Each day Jimmy begs for money at his local off-ramp.  Through no fault of his own, Jimmy has fallen through the proverbial cracks. Jimmy applies for welfare.

Options

You are the welfare overseer. At most one person can get welfare. You can make ONE of the following three decisions:

1. Give the welfare only to Rebecca
2. Give the welfare only Jimmy
3. Don't give any welfare