Reference no: EM133136860

Georgia Department of Highways

"There, at last, it's finished," thought Rajiv Chaudhry, as he laid aside the last of 12 performance appraisal forms. It had been a busy week for Rajiv, who supervises a road maintenance crew for the Georgia Department of Highways.

In passing through Rajiv's district a few days earlier, the governor had complained to the area superintendent that repairs were needed on several of the highways. Because of this, the superintendent assigned Rajiv's crew an unusually heavy workload. In addition, Rajiv received a call from the human resource office that week telling him that the performance appraisals were late. Rajiv explained his predicament, but the HR specialist insisted that the forms be completed right away:

Looking over the appraisals again, Rajiv thought about several of the workers. The performance appraisal form had places for marking quantity of work, quality of work, and cooperativeness. For each characteristic, the worker could be graded outstanding, good, average, below average, or unsatisfactory. As Rajiv's crew had completed all of the extra work assigned for that week, he marked every worker outstanding in the quantity of work. He marked Joe Blum average in cooperativeness because Joe had questioned one of his decisions that week. Rajiv had decided to patch a pothole in one of the roads, and Joe thought the small section of road surface ought to be broken out and replaced. Rajiv didn't include this in the remarks section of the form, though. As a matter of fact, he wrote no remarks on any of the forms.

Rajiv felt a twinge of guilt as he thought about Roger Short. He knew that Roger had been goofing off, and the other workers had been carrying him for quite some time. He also knew that Roger would be upset if he found that he had been marked lower than the other workers. Consequently, he marked Roger the same to avoid a confrontation. "Anyway," Rajiv thought, "these things are a pain, and I really shouldn't have to bother with them."

As Rajiv folded up the performance appraisals and put them in the envelope for mailing, he smiled. He was glad he would not have to think about performance appraisals for another six months.

QUESTIONS

Note: Explain the answers as much as you can

1. Critically discuss the implications Rajiv's performance appraisals may have on those HR practices that rely on employee assessments and evaluations such as promotions and merit pay decisions: Explore the consequences for the firm if an appraisal is inaccurate.

2. Formulate at least 2 solutions for HR to ensure that management is utilizing the appraisal tool properly and effectively: Recommend incentives that would encourage management to be unbiased, transparent, and accurate when appraising their workers.