Regarding the guidelines for the assignment 1) The marking criteria on pg 6 of the pdf attached needs to be followed strictly. 2)Word limit is 1200 words. 3)Format needs to be followed and lastly give it your best shot as after this i'll be consulting you guys for another big assignment next month depending on the marks i get for this assignment. Looking forward to it. Assignment attached below. Subject name is Company and Commercial Law. 30090028_1Mid-semester Assessment.pdf Thank you for your work. 30090049_119534394 CCL.docx Refer the marking Criteria, under which refer the "very high" section criteria. Accordingly answer the questions asked in the assignment. Although, good work overall. Below i have attached the result of the law assignment which was done by you guys in which i scored 87/100. Proof is attached below. 30090058_119534394.pdf

4. Evaluation and Conclusion Thoughtfully evaluates alternative points of view. Offers evaluations alternative points of view. of Some evaluation of alternative points of view. Superficially evaluates alternative points of view. Ignores alternative points of view. Draws justified conclusions based on clearly explained reasons. Draws justified conclusion on mostly explained reasons. Draws justified conclusions based on some evidence. Draws unjustified conclusions based on little evidence. Draws irrelevant unjustified conclusions. or Please note that the marking criteria do not carry equal weight. Furthermore, some of them might not be applicable to a particular question. So they are only indicative as to how you went overall in the assessment task not a specific question.

3. Structure Logical flow of ideas and content in the right sections. Mostly well structured and content mostly in the right section. Used structure and content sometimes in the illogical area. Used structure though contents mostly in the wrong area. Lack of structure. Coherence between and within sections. Mostly coherent between and within sections. Some coherence between but sometimes not within sections or vice versa. Some coherence between but mostly not within sections or vice versa. Lack of coherence within and between sections. Title and headings are present, clear, reflect on and relate to each other. Title and headings are present and mostly clear, reflect on and relate to each other. Title and present, but refinement. headings require are some Title and headings may be present but require refinement and/or may not relate to each other. Title and headings are not present.

2. Communication Appropriate use of discipline specific language with sound understanding of the underlying concepts. Use mostly discipline specific language with occasional misunderstandings in the understanding. Use some discipline specific language which is sometimes incorrect. Use some discipline specific language albeit incorrectly, lacks understanding. Use mainly lay language and understanding not communicated. Presentation format and style engaging and highly appropriate for the audience. Presentation format and style mostly appropriate for the audience. Presentation format and style sometimes engaging and appropriate for the audience. Presentation format and style lacks engagement and is mainly inappropriate for the audience. Presentation and format not engaging and not appropriate for the audience.

Marking Criteria Very High High Pass Low Not shown 1. Interpretation and Analysis Fulfils the task and answers correctly. Fulfils the task and answers mostly correctly. Partially fulfils the task and answers somewhat correctly. Does not fulfil the task and answers mostly incorrectly or vice versa. Does not fulfil the task and answers incorrectly. Identifies the salient case law or statutory law. Identifies most relevant case law or statutory law. Identifies some relevant case law or statutory law. Fails to identify salient case law or statutory law. Fails to identify or dismisses relevant case law or statutory law. Identifies the salient arguments for and against a position. Identifies most relevant arguments for and against a position. Identifies some relevant arguments for and against a position. Fails to identify salient arguments for and against a position. Fails to identify or dismisses relevant arguments for and against a position.