Am grateful to the expertsmind team, they are doing a great job, helping students like me to get good grades tackling such difficult assignments. They should continue such good work to carry students along with them in the area of tutoring. thanks. Assessment is very well done. I'm hoping for the best as i haven't got the results yet. But the answers look solid. Thank you again.

D: 10 – 8:75 D: 10 - 9 C: 8.5 - 8 P: 7.5 - 6 FF: 5.5 - 0 C: 8:50 – 7:50 D: 10 - 9 C: 8.5 - 8 P: 7.5 - 6 FF: 5.5 - 0 Writing style and structure are very good. Very few minor errors in spelling or grammar. Some tendency to rely on jargon, acronyms, or use language not suitable for an interdisciplinary audience. Evidence provided where required throughout the paper. Good use of APA referencing style with a small number of minor errors in the text or the reference list. Demonstrates a solid understanding of professional referencing. Writing style and structure is generally good with only minor errors in spelling and grammar. Phrasing may be cumbersome or awkward in places. Evidence provided where required in the paper. Mostly accurate use of APA referencing style: standard format, direct quotes, in-text citations and reference list. Some errors

D: 13.25 - 12 C: 11.75 – 10.5 Clear visual representation of the proposed timeline and a table setting out the budget are included. Timeline and budget are consistent with the proposal. Most key strengths and limitations are discussed. Limitations mostly justified with reference to ethical and practical constraints. The limitations section argues that this proposed method is the best possible approach to answer the research question. Some guidance is provided about what conclusions can or cannot be drawn from the study. Visual representation of the proposed timeline and a list of resources required for the project are included. Only minor discrepancies are evident in the timeline and budget. Good attempt to discuss strengths and limitations, although a key strength or limitation may have been overlooked. Good attempt to justify limitations with reference to ethical and practical constraints. There is an attempt to argue that the proposed method is the best possible approach to answer the research question.

D: 20.25 - 18 C: 17.75 - 15.5 Principles of ethical research and the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research are used in the discussion of ethics. Most potential ethical problems are explained and an approach to avoid or suitably mitigate these problems are provided. Evidence is mostly provided where required. Appropriate ethical approvals processes are explained. The project could be completed ethically. Principles of ethical research and the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research are described in the discussion of ethics. Major ethical problems are explained and approaches to avoid or mitigate problems are provided, although there may still be some minor issues not fully resolved. A statement about an ethics approval process is included. The project could be completed ethically with minor adjustments.

D: 26.5 - 24 C: 23.75 – 20.75 The proposal is mostly congruent with only minor inconsistencies across elements of the design. Each element is explained and justified with reference to quality research methods texts, although there may be a tendency to rely on technical language or jargon. The proposal demonstrates solid understanding of methods covered in the course. The proposed method would answer the research question. While there is some incongruence across elements of the design, the student demonstrates an understanding of the difference between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Each element is explained and there is a good attempt to justify, although arguments may be weak or not always supported with reference to research methods texts. The proposal demonstrates an understanding of methods covered in the course. The proposed method could answer the research question with minor adjustment.

D: 13.25 - 12 C: 11.75 – 10.5 The topic and all key concepts are defined clearly, although language may be technical in places. The review argues that there is an important gap in existing knowledge, and supports this with evidence. The conceptual or theoretical framework for the study is coherent, but may benefit from better explanation or more explicit discussion. Logical and achievable aims are set out. The research question is clear, specific, and answerable. An explicit statement of the topic is provided. Key terms are defined but definitions may be superficial. The review states that there is an important gap in knowledge and this is mostly supported with evidence. There is a good attempt to integrate theory as a grounding for the study. Aims are consistent with the gap identified in the literature. The research question is clear but may need some refinement to be more specific and answerable.