Reference no: EM13855960

Group Work Protocol

The following group work protocol is required to satisfy the by-laws on assessment tasks of the Faculty of Business at UTS.

Group work and group assignments are an important part of business education. The purpose of group work goes beyond the requirements of the group project itself. Group work is also intended to develop awareness of the dynamics of teamwork and your role in a team environment. In undertaking group work it is expected that each team member will communicate with other team members in a professional and courteous manner. Resolving any conflict or difficulties that arise within the team is also part of the group dynamics that may emerge during the project. It is expected that each team member will take responsibility for managing and reducing any conflict that may arise. If the team members are unable to resolve tensions or conflicts then this MUST be discussed with the lecturer/tutor as soon as it becomes obvious that a resolution within the team cannot be agreed.

In the learning environment of group work we are seeking to ensure that you develop and demonstrate both academic skills and important group work skills such as:

• Commitment to working with others (eg, undertaking a fair share of the work, sharing ideas, doing the tasks allocated, attending meetings)

• Collaboration and inclusiveness (eg encouraging and supporting others, respecting others; recognising the skills and valuing the contribution of others, helping resolve conflicts)

• Contribution to establishing and working towards a common outcome (eg establishing and supporting team goals, plans, rules, roles, decisions)

Group Work Declaration Form

Individuals must sign a declaration form, otherwise the project report will not be marked. Complete only Part 1 or Part 2. Do not complete both. This sheet should be completed and handed in along with your group assignment.

Part 1:

I believe that all members of the group have contributed fairly to this assignment, and each member should receive the same mark for the assignment.

Part 2:

I believe that not all members of the group have contributed fairly to this assignment. I believe the proportion of the total workload that each has contributed is indicated below.

Q1. : Consider the straight line through the origin given by y= b_1 x for some parameter b_1 . Given a set of data points for , formulate a minimisation problem for the least squares estimator estimator (b_1 ) ^ for the parameter b_1. (Note, this is the OLS regression without a constant term).

Q2. : Using calculus, find an expression for the least squares estimator (b_1 ) ^ in terms of the for .for the OLS regression in Q1.

Q3.: Prove that the least squares estimator you derived in the previous question gives rise to a minimum. (Hint: consider the second derivative).

Q4. Read the given data file data.xls into EVIEWS, and run a regression of KMLIT against the rest of the variables assuming homoskedastic errors. Copy and paste the EVIEWS output into the space below, and report the estimated equation with the standard errors below the coefficients.

Q5. Comment on the sign of each estimated coefficient in turn, and state whether this is what you expect. Ignore significance at this stage.

Q6 Interpret the estimated effect of the Number of Cylinders (CYL) on kilometers travelled. .

Q7 Formulate and carry out an appropriate hypothesis test, to test whether Engine size affects a car's mileage (i.e. how far it can travel per litre). Use the t-statistic approach, at the α=0.05 level.

Q8 Formulate and carry out an appropriate hypothesis test for testing whether the number of cylinders affects a car's mileage. Use the p-values approach, at the α=0.05 level.

Q9 Test the following hypotheses about the coefficients on CYL (B₁) and ENGCM3 (B₂). Clearly specify the rejection region if you are using critical values, and clearly state your conclusions. When using p values, calculate and compare your p-values to the test size then state your conclusion.

(Hint, assume the Central Limit Theorem Holds)

(a) H₀: , H₁: , with α=0.05 using the critical-value approach.
(b) H₀: , H₁: , with α=0.05 using the critical-value approach.
(c) H₀: , H₁: , with α=0.05 using the p-value approach.
(d) H₀: , H₁: , with α=0.05 using the p-value approach.

Q10 You want to test whether a unit increase in a car's weight (mass) has a greater detrimental effect on fuel efficiency than a unit increase in the power of the car's engine, rather than the same effect. Formulate a hypothesis test to do this. Use re-parametrisation to convert the model to allow you to test this hypothesis using a simple t-test.

Q11 Verify that the "OLS Wonder Equation" gives a standard error for the CYL coefficient close to 0.145. You will need to run a regression of CYL on all the other independent variables, and you must include this regression output below. (Remember, the OLS Wonder Equation gives an estimate of the homoskedasticity consistent standard error):

Q12 Test the following joint hypothesis about the coefficients on CYL (B₁) and ENGCM₃ (B₂): H₀: and , H₁: or , with α=0.05.

Along with the previous results, what do you conclude about B₁ and B₂? Is this consistent with your intuition?

Q13. Can you explain any conflict between the implications of the results obtained about and and your expectations? (Hint: Run auxiliary regressions for the explanatory variables in question against the others, and compute the correlations between all the explanatory variables. What do you notice?).