Top rated work that I havenot seen in ny other websites. They have very quick responsive rate and very good team of experts. Experts have very deep knowledge about topics and explain them in detailed manner.

6. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

Partially suggested which company should be awarded this government contract based on the data that was presented for each company. Partially provided three to five (3-5) reasons to support your stance. Satisfactorily suggested which company should be awarded this government contract based on the data that was presented for each company. Satisfactorily provided three to five (3-5) reasons to support your stance. Thoroughly suggested which company should be awarded this government contract based on the data that was presented for each company. Thoroughly provided three to five (3-5) reasons to support your stance.

5. Suggest which company should be awarded this government contract based on the data that was presented for each company. Next, provide three to five (3-5) reasons to support your stance. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely suggested which company should be awarded this government contract based on the data that was presented for each company. Did not submit or incompletely provided three to five (3-5) reasons to support your stance. Insufficiently suggested which company should be awarded this government contract based on the data that was presented for each company. Insufficiently provided three to five (3-5) reasons to support your stance.

Partially discussed at least three (3) direct costs and three (3) indirect costs that each company incurred during the production of its navigation system. Partially explained the manner in which this data would factor into your decision as to which company would be more eligible to receive the contract. Satisfactorily discussed at least three (3) direct costs and three (3) indirect costs that each company incurred during the production of its navigation system. Satisfactorily explained the manner in which this data would factor into your decision as to which company would be more eligible to receive the contract. Thoroughly discussed at least three (3) direct costs and three (3) indirect costs that each company incurred during the production of its navigation system. Thoroughly explained the manner in which this data would factor into your decision as to which company would be more eligible to receive the contract.

4. Discuss at least three (3) direct costs and three (3) indirect costs that each company incurred during the production of its navigation system. Explain the manner in which this data would factor into your decision as to which company would be more eligible to receive the contract. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely discussed at least three (3) direct costs and three (3) indirect costs that each company incurred during the production of its navigation system. Did not submit or incompletely explained the manner in which this data would factor into your decision as to which company would be more eligible to receive the contract. Insufficiently discussed at least three (3) direct costs and three (3) indirect costs that each company incurred during the production of its navigation system. Insufficiently explained the manner in which this data would factor into your decision as to which company would be more eligible to receive the contract.

3. Determine the type(s) of contract for which both companies might be eligible (e.g., fixed-price, cost reimbursement, etc.). Justify the response. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely determined the type(s) of contract for which both companies might be eligible (e.g., fixed-price, cost reimbursement, etc.). Did not submit or incompletely justified the response. Insufficiently determined the type(s) of contract for which both companies might be eligible (e.g., fixed-price, cost reimbursement, etc.). Insufficiently justified the response. Partially determined the type(s) of contract for which both companies might be eligible (e.g., fixed-price, cost reimbursement, etc.). Partially justified the response. Satisfactorily determined the type(s) of contract for which both companies might be eligible (e.g., fixed-price, cost reimbursement, etc.). Satisfactorily justified the response. Thoroughly determined the type(s) of contract for which both companies might be eligible (e.g., fixed-price, cost reimbursement, etc.). Thoroughly justified the response.

2. Specify at least one (1) of the recent major contracts that was awarded to both companies. Explain the fundamental reasons why both companies were awarded the contract(s) that you specified. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely specified at least one (1) of the recent major contracts that was awarded to both companies. Did not submit or incompletely explained the fundamental reasons why both companies were awarded the contract(s) that you specified. Insufficiently specified at least one (1) of the recent major contracts that was awarded to both companies. Insufficiently explained the fundamental reasons why both companies were awarded the contract(s) that you specified. Partially specified at least one (1) of the recent major contracts that was awarded to both companies. Partially explained the fundamental reasons why both companies were awarded the contract(s) that you specified. Satisfactorily specified at least one (1) of the recent major contracts that was awarded to both companies. Satisfactorily explained the fundamental reasons why both companies were awarded the contract

Points: 300 Assignment 4: Federal Contracting Activities and Contract Types Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Create a one (1) page overview of the history and background of each company vying for the government contract. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely created a one (1) page overview of the history and background of each company vying for the government contract. Insufficiently created a one (1) page overview of the history and background of each company vying for the government contract. Partially created a one (1) page overview of the history and background of each company vying for the government contract. Satisfactorily created a one (1) page overview of the history and background of each company vying for the government contract. Thoroughly created a one (1) page overview of the history and background of each company vying for the government contract.