Extreme and outrageous requirement sets

Reference no: EM133685541

Question

Kroeger v Brautigam 2016 Wisc App Lexus 570 Why did the trial court rule that the activities of the defendants (save for one defendant), did not constitute Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress? Do you agree with the court's assessment? Consider the elements of IIED when answering the question.

1. Why does the court state that the "extreme and outrageous" requirement sets a high bar for actionable conduct? What policy(s) might be implicated by setting a high bar?

2. The one defendant not originally dismissed was Robert Brautigam. Why would the case go forward against him and not the others? That is, what was different about his actions, as opposed to the action of the other defendants?

3. What other intentional torts could the plaintiffs have been claimed against Robert Brautigam based on his actions? Note: There is at least one and possibly others.

4. The case takes an unusual turn beginning in Paragraph 22 of the case. What did the court see as a potential "civil conspiracy" and why was that important to disposition of the case?

Reference no: EM133685541

Questions Cloud

Why the dependency exists in relation to constraints discuss : List and explain all the project dependencies among the project activities. Discuss why the dependency exists in relation to the constraints discussed.

About the differences between adult and juvenile court : When you visit Mallory and her parents, what will you tell them about the differences between adult and juvenile court?

Intellectual justification for universal jurisdiction : What conditions must be met for an individual to qualify as a combatant during war? What is the intellectual justification for universal jurisdiction?

Describe the core attributes of an effective team : Describe the core attributes of an effective team and the strategies you would implement to develop team dynamics that will benefit the organization.

Extreme and outrageous requirement sets : Why does the court state that the "extreme and outrageous" requirement sets a high bar for actionable conduct?

How might you have helped the group work through that stage : How might you have helped the group work through that stage differently, based on what you know now about the five stages of group and team development?

What concepts strategy or techniques have you found valuable : What concepts, strategies, or techniques have you found most valuable, and how do you envision applying them in your professional life?

Financial reporting fraud is considered white collar crime : Financial reporting fraud is considered a white collar crime. In response to several financial reporting scandal, legislation

Describe how the chart demonstrates concepts or principles : Name or list any problems and suggest solutions. If you cannot find any problem, describe how the chart demonstrates concepts or principles that we have covered

User Account

All Pages