Reference no: EM133743119
Case: Is it possible to use just one data source rather than trying to link or combine datasets from different sources?
Some suggestions: Consider splitting RQ3 into RQ3a and RQ3b, so that you can more precisely examine the direct relationship between air pollution and respiratory health outcomes (RQ3a) and then explore how this relationship varies with socioeconomic status (RQ3b). This approach allows for a more detailed and nuanced understanding of the factors influencing respiratory health among children in California.
Splitting RQ3 into two separate questions can provide greater clarity and focus for your study. Here are the revised research questions along with their associated hypotheses:
Revised Research Questions and Hypotheses
RQ1: Is there a significant relationship between particulate matter and respiratory illnesses among children in California?
H01: There is no significant relationship between particulate matter and respiratory illnesses among children in California.
Ha1: There is a significant relationship between particulate matter and respiratory illnesses among children in California.
RQ2: Does socioeconomic status impact the association between air pollution exposure and respiratory illnesses among children in California?
H0: Socioeconomic status does not impact the association between air pollution exposure and respiratory illnesses among children in California.
H1: Socioeconomic status impacts the association between air pollution exposure and respiratory illnesses among children in California.
Revised RQ3a: What is the correlation between air pollution levels and respiratory illnesses among children in California?