Explore statistical significance and meaningfulness

Reference no: EM133193591

Once you start to understand how exciting the world of statistics can be, it is tempting to fall into the trap of chasing statistical significance. That is, you may be tempted always to look for relationships that are statistically significant and believe they are valuable solely because of their significance. Although statistical hypothesis testing does help you evaluate claims, it is important to understand the limitations of statistical significance and to interpret the results within the context of the research and its pragmatic, "real world" application.

As a scholar-practitioner, it is important for you to understand that just because a hypothesis test indicates a relationship exists between an intervention and an outcome, there is a difference between groups, or there is a correlation between two constructs, it does not always provide a default measure for its importance. Although relationships are significant, they can be very minute relationships, very small differences, or very weak correlations. In the end, we need to ask whether the relationships or differences observed are large enough that we should make some practical change in policy or practice.

For this Discussion, you will explore statistical significance and meaningfulness.

Review the Learning Resources related to hypothesis testing, meaningfulness, and statistical significance.

Review Magnusson's web blog found in the Learning Resources to further your visualization and understanding of statistical power and significance testing.

Review the American Statistical Association's press release and consider the misconceptions and misuse of p-values.

Consider the scenario:
A research paper claims a meaningful contribution to the literature based on finding statistically significant relationships between predictor and response variables. In the footnotes, you see the following statement, "given this research was exploratory in nature, traditional levels of significance to reject the null hypotheses were relaxed to the .10 level."

Reference no: EM133193591

Questions Cloud

Define what a public leader is : PAD 515 Savannah Technical College - Define what a public leader is. Cite experiences and research to support your assertions.

Factors that might explain why people are violent : Abraham Lincoln University - Identify and discuss 3 BIOLOGICAL factors that might explain why people are violent.

What are system rules according to hocker and wilmot : COU 680 Southern New Hampshire University-What are system rules according to Hocker and Wilmot? Identify and discuss three examples of implicit or explicit rule

What was the most surprising part of the exercise : What was the most surprising part of this exercise? What was the most hurtful/uncomfortable/unbelievable part of your character's experience?

Explore statistical significance and meaningfulness : Walden University-Once you start to understand how exciting the world of statistics can be, it is tempting to fall into the trap of chasing statistical signific

Procedures of the international organization : Drexel University-Most of the cancer-causing substances in smoke are in tar, which is the materialthat remains after cigarette smoke is passed through a filter.

How might fact affect buy-marts liability : bul 4321 Florida International University - What is the key factor in determining whether Buy-Mart is liable under this doctrine and Did Watts's behavior

How does porn perpetuate violence and stereotypes : What are your reactions and thoughts about what you learned from watching these documentaries? How does porn perpetuate violence and stereotypes?

Write points about gas drilling and fracking hazards : Write fifteen points about gas drilling and fracking hazards. Find a video or a source from Osha and write fifteen points about it.

User Account

All Pages