Lessons learnt Lessons learnt had no clear link to failure reasons or were not presented. Some of the lessons learnt were unclearly presented for how they linked to failure reasons. Lessons learnt were presented reasonably clearly with links to the failure reasons. Lessons learnt directly linked to failure reasons and were clearly and concisely presented. Application to PM concepts Items presented were not linked to PM concepts and were instead management or business generic. Little or few items were linked to PM concepts. Most items were linked back to PM concepts but some items left as fairly generic. Clearly linked back to course material and PM concepts, knowledge areas and processes.

Knowledge and Critical Thinking Identification of reasons for failure Failure reasons not clearly presented and not summarised, the result of the failure was presented but not the reasons behind. Failure reasons presented but were unclear at times or not summarised. Some hard to grasp. Clear identification and presentation of failure reasons. Root causes mostly understood. Very clear and informative identification of key failure reasons. Root causes easily understood and grasped.

Ease of reading Document was hard to read, crowded with text. Layouts were unclear. No graphics. Some areas hard to read. Too much text with no beneficial layout. Little graphics. Easy to read. Good layout. Some interesting graphics. Clear and easy to read. Very effective use of layouts, outline text, transitions. Interesting use of graphics. Overall structure Information presented in a logical, interesting sequence. No signposting or section links. Information presented in an unclear sequence. Little signposting or section links. Information presented in a logical sequence. Some signposting and section links. Information presented in a logical, interesting sequence. Clear signposting and section links.

Assessment Criteria (Rubric) The following assessment criteria are included as a guide only for how the assessment will be marked. Element of Plan Needs Improvement Fair Good Excellent Structure and Mechanics Introduction to project Project overview and introduction not included or missing significant information. Project overview missing some key information. Introduction unclear. Clear project overview and presentation introduction. Clear concise informative project overview and presentation introduction. Spelling and grammar Many misspellings and/or grammatical errors. Some misspellings and/or grammatical errors. A few misspellings and/or grammatical errors. No misspellings or grammatical errors.

If you are intending to submit the report in a format which isn’t normally presented as a pdf, such as an e-portfolio, then please discuss this with your course coordinator early in the course to make sure there isn't a last minute issue with the file format. Course Learning Outcomes and Capability Development This assignment will contribute to the following course learning outcomes and program learning outcomes: Course Learning Outcomes Assessed Scope, develop and manage a project utilising appropriate project management techniques No Critique cases studies in project management practice and identify the legal implications for professional practice Yes Apply best practice project management principles to assess the efficacy of project management practice in a workplace setting Yes Work as team member and leader to produce a project plan No Reflect on the experience of working in a team to improve team function No Undertake individual research within the field of project management Yes

Word/Page Count: Maximum 1800 words (but could be much less depending on your format) Expected Time Commitment: 8-12 hours in total Separate RMIT Cover Sheet Required: No Feedback Method: Feedback will be provided using Turnitin's inline marking tool and general comments