Reference Skilful use of high quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas. Accurate citations and references using the appropriate style. All sources cited. Appropriate paraphrasing and use of direct quotes. Consistent use of high quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are relevant to the chosen field. Accurate citations and references using the appropriate style. All sources cited. Demonstrate an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas. citations and references and/or in referencing style well used. Most sources cited. Demonstrate an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing. complete and precise referencing. Sources are well and perfevtly used to support ideas. complete and precise refefencing.

Analysis of the business case (possible theoretical framework to defend) or Strong demonstration of technical skill to generate and evaluate complex ideas and concepts at the Demonstration of technical skill to generate and evaluate complex ideas and concepts at the Inadequate demonstration of technical skill to generate and evaluate complex Weak demonstration of technical skill to generate and evaluate complex ideas and concepts at the .Proper demonstration of technical skill to generate and evaluate complex done journal article (strength and/or weakness) abstract level. Clear identification of strength or weakness of the article or strong theoretical framework of defence for business case underpinned by the appropriate technical knowledge. abstract level. Identification of strength or weakness of the article or theoretical framework of defence for business case underpinned by the appropriate technical knowledge. ideas and concepts at the abstract level. proper identification of strength or weakness of the article or theoretical framework of defence for business case underpinned by the appropriate technical knowledge.

Critical Review of Business Case/Journal article The business case/journal article is reviewed critically reflecting the technical and cognitive skills. Use of appropriate knowledge gained from the units and draw a clear map. The business case/journal article is reviewed critically. Adequate use of technical and cognitive skill. adequate demonstration of mapping the appropriate knowledge gained from the units. The business case/journal article is reviewed critically. adequate use of technical and cognitive skill. Demonstration of mapping the appropriate knowledge gained from the units is completed The business case/journal article is reviewed. Technical and cognitive skill is proper.nicley draw context based on the knowledge gained from the unit content Perfectl written. properly examined the article or business case critically.

Literature Reflect the cognitive, technical and creative skills to investigate, analyse and synthesise the chosen field with appropriate illustration. Skilful use of high quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas. Use of cognitive and technical skills to investigate, analyse and synthesise the chosen field with appropriate illustration. Use of relevant resources to develop ideas. Good innovation power used and sources are of very high quality. Investigate, analyse and synthesise the chosen field with appropriate illustration. Lots of innovation and resources used to underpin the literature. Investigate, analyse and synthesise the chosen field with appropriate illustration. Lots of innovation and resources used to underpin the literature. Long and explained & relevance to the topic. Good references or Proper references.

Criteria HD (80-100%) D (70-79%) C (60-69%) P (50 – 59%) N (40 – 49%) Abstract Highly appropriate, innovative and excellently written. Background, aim and results are articulated concisely and clearly. Highly relevant and proportion to each other. Appropriate and well written with relevant background, aim, results and conclusion, in proportion to each other. Well written with relevant background, aim, results and conclusion, in proportion to each other. Background, aim, results are articulated but the different parts of the abstract is not in well proportion to each other. Failed to brief the background, aims and results and either too long or too short.

Task 1: Marking Criteria Criteria Description of the section Marks Plain Text Retrieval Tutor will try retrieve the plain text from the submitted cipher text. 10 Task 2: Marking Criteria Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Abstract You should write a brief abstract that will provide a glimpse of your report 2 Literature You should write a brief literature survey on your chosen field. Your literature survey should be supported by at least 3-4 research articles 2 Business Case/Journal article In this section, you need to present the business case that you will analyze in this report 2 Analysis of the business case or journal article In this section, you should present your detailed analysis. 10 Conclusion Draw a conclusion. 2 Reference All references should be in IEEE style 2 Total 30

The report is due at Week 11 Submission Guidelines: 1. You will upload two files – • Task 1 – A .txt file containing the cipher text • Task 2 – A .pdf file, this will be checked through turnitin. Late submission of assignments will be penalised as follows: • For assignments 1 to 5 days late, a penalty of 10% (of total available marks) per day. • For assignments more than 5 days late, a penalty of 100% will apply. Marking criteria: Example of marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows: Note: The marking criteria varies for each assignment