Reference no: EM133617736
Discussion Post: Interview
Robert
Robert is a 39-year-old male. He has been admitted to the Hart City Hospital after someone found him unresponsive in a parking lot. Robert had no identification and hospital workers assume he is homeless. Robert received a diabetes diagnosis related to gangrene, which required one of his legs to be amputated below the knee. Robert reports that he has no family, no income, and no permanent residence. He is in need of an assessment to determine placement and services after the hospital releases him.
Change talk is language that reflects movement towards change. There are two broad types of change talk: preparatory and mobilizing. Preparatory change talk occurs when the service user is thinking about changing or exploring a specific change. Mobilizing change talk occurs when the service user is ready to commit to change.
In this Discussion, you will apply strategies for evoking change talk from the service user in the case study you were assigned. You will also consider whether you would evoke preparatory or mobilizing change talk with the service user. As you do so, keep in mind that evoking mobilizing change talk (i.e., commitment to change) before the service user is ready can backfire.
To Prepare
1. Review your Course Announcements for possible information related to this week's Discussion and Assignment.
2. Review the Learning Resources on change talk.
3. Go to the Hart City virtual community using the link that is provided in the Learning Resources. Once you are in the community, review the case study you were assigned.
4. Reflect on the service user's presenting challenge.
5. Based on the service user and their presenting challenge, identify three strategies for evoking change talk you would use. Then, consider whether you would use preparatory or mobilizing change talk with the service user.
Task
Identify the Hart City case study you were assigned in the subject line of your post.
Based on your Hart City service user and their presenting challenge, post a description of three strategies for evoking change talk you would use. Explain why you believe each is the correct strategy to use with your particular service user and their presenting challenge. Then, explain whether you would evoke preparatory or mobilizing change talk with your service user, and why.
Design a survey and conduct it in the classroom
: Design a survey and conduct it in the classroom. Your classmates will be your samples, so make sure to collect important demographic information
|
Explain how your examples inform your role as supervisor
: What behaviors did they demonstrate? Explain how your examples would inform your role as a supervisor in a human services setting.
|
How the private sector may be activated to reduce
: How the private sector may be activated to reduce the health equity issue, "addressing the Opioid crisis particularly the fentanyl deaths.
|
Do extensive research into the upcoming future
: Do extensive research into the upcoming future of the technology in the hospitality industry, specifically accommodation/hotels
|
Explain why you believe each is the correct strategy to use
: Explain why you believe each is the correct strategy to use with your particular service user and their presenting challenge.
|
Explore black and indigenous youth experiences
: Using composite counter-storytelling to explore Black and Indigenous youth experiences and perceptions of the police in Canada.
|
Suggest the best method for entering the market
: Suggest the best method for entering the market such as exporting, licensing, franchising, joint venture, wholly-owned subsidiary, etc. Explain rationale
|
Why do you think some public benefits carry more stigma
: In a hand up for lower-income families by Sarah Halpern meekin, Laura Tach, Jennifer Sykes, Kathryn Edin authors describe the EITC as "socially incorporating.
|
Why does the prevention of material handling injuries
: Why does the prevention of material handling injuries continue to be a difficult task? Little effort to find solutions Political consideration affecting policy
|