Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Table 1 is provided as a reference for input values for your model.
Table 1. Input Variable for Scenario Analysis
Variable Name
Description
Base
Best
Worst
Pr_PROB
Per-act HIV infection without PEP
0.02
0.03
0.006
Pr_PREV
Partner is HIV-infected
0.18
1
0.06
Pr_ADHERE1
Patients' adherence to full course of therapy
in absence of side effects
0.79
0.84
0.68
Pr_ADHERE2
when side effects occur
0.59
0.5
Pr_PEPE
Effectiveness of full course of PEP
0.94
0.43
Pr_SIDE
Probability of PEP side effects
0.2
0.8
r
Discount rate
3%
0
5%
C_PEP
Cost of PEP per person
$679
$439
$1,048
Q_SIDE
QALYs lost due to side effect
0.005
Note:C_HIVMC, Q_HIV and Q_NOHIV are functions of discount rate and annual values; they will vary in accordance with the discount rate r.
C_HIVMC = NPV(r;0; 0; 3267; 9303; 9303; 9303; 16167; 16167; 16167; 17835; 17835; 17835; 17835; 25729; 49010; 49010)*172.2/156.9
Q_HIV = NPV(r;0.940; 0.940; 0.910; 0.870; 0.870; 0.870; 0.820; 0.820; 0.820; 0.760; 0.760; 0.760; 0.760; 0.650; 0.620; 0.620)
Q_NOHIV = PV(0.940; 0; r; 39)
Note: You do not need to make best and worst case variables for C_HIVMC, Q_NOHIV and Q_HIV. These values are functions of the discount rate. They will change as a function of the best and worst case discount rates.
Remember to save different versions of your tree if you want to make changes to your base tree to save time.
Answer the following questions. Please type your answers.
1. Consider variables: Pr_Prob and Pr SIDE. Explain why a relatively high value for the former and a relatively low value for the latter are the input values for the BEST case.
2. Please completetable 2 below.
3. Please describe generally what a best and worst case scenario analysis is and why we conduct them.
4. Explain the results presented in your table to a policy-maker.
Table 2: Base, Best and Worst Case Results
Scenario
Cost
Incremental
Effects
Incremental Effect
ICER
Base Case
PEP
No-PEP
There are three alternative plans that indicate the benefits and costs associated with the construction of a Manitoba hazardous waste facility
There are three alternative plans that indicate the benefits and costs associated with the construction of a Manitoba hazardous waste facility (see table on next page).
The purpose of this project is to promote better understanding of globalization, world trade and economic development, including the forces, values, events etc.
Italy is a large European country with a staggering public debt and underperforming economy.
Understand different theories of social welfare
Theoretical analysis and discussion of economic principles
The American patent system was based on the presumption that social welfare coincided with the individual welfare of inventors
Health economic theory and practice
Discuss one of the ingredients of growth pertinent to today's economy
What is Public Enterprise
Explain the role of monitoring and evaluation in Quality Assurance Discuss Five tools that you can use to effectively monitor the activities of your school
How does economics differ from a natural science like chemistry and formal science like mathematics? How is it similar to other social sciences like anthropology and political science?
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd