Explain who would win and why

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM132287612 , Length: word count:500

Case Analysis Assignment -

Complete all three parts for this case analysis assignment.

Part 1: Sexual Harassment

Look up the following cases using LexisNexis (Nexis Uni) Use directions to get there in the Discussion above: If you have trouble simply Google each case. Just make sure you get the right one.

1. Gleason v. Mesirow Financial, Inc., 118 F.3d 1134 (7th Cir. 1997).

2. Brill v. Lante , 119 F.3d 1266 (7th Cir. 1997).

3. Guidry v. Zale Corp. , 969 F. Supp. 988 (M.D. La. 1997).

4. Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka , 970 F. Supp. 833 (D. Kan. 1997).

5. After reviewing these cases, determine whether each one would be considered sexual harassment and explain why or why not (the court's rationale).

Part 2: Hiring Discrimination

Look up Fessel v. Masonic Home, 17 FEP Cases 330 (Del. 1978) using LexisNexis(Nexis Uni). In this suit brought by a male nurse's aide who was denied employment, explain who would win and why (rationale in hiring discrimination based on sex).

Part 3: Conclusion

Conclude with a summary of the case findings that might serve as a brief guide of key principles for business leaders.

No APA title or reference page is required for this assignment, but all cases and statutes must be properly cited.

Reference no: EM132287612

Questions Cloud

Businesses commonly rely upon groups to make decisions : Businesses commonly rely upon groups to make decisions because of the many advantages to group decision making.

Discuss heartsong competitive advantage : Discuss Heartsong's competitive advantage, including the value-chain activities that appear to underlie this advantage,

Discipline in response to complaints of sexual harassment : Draft a performance action plan for a company to follow when providing discipline in response to complaints of sexual harassment.

Sells educational multimedia products : Susie is a sales person that sells educational multimedia products. Evaluate the above ethical dilemma by applying each of the Ethical Decision Making Principle

Explain who would win and why : Hiring Discrimination - In this suit brought by a male nurse's aide who was denied employment, explain who would win and why

Which bus is better choice based on life-cycle analysis : A Southern Georgia school district is considering ordering 51 ?propane-fueled school buses. Which bus is the better choice based on a? life-cycle analysis?

Both leadership and management involve influence : Leadership and management are the same thing. Both leadership and management involve influence.

The contribution of key members to team purpose : Assess the purpose of the team (i.e., what is the project it has been assigned?) and the contribution of key members to team purpose.

Describing the scope of your investigation and analysis : What is the next step to take after defining the issue and describing the scope of your investigation and analysis?

User Account

All Pages