Explain who is correct in given case

Assignment Help Management Theories

Reference no: EM131377949

Katz offered to purchase land from Joiner, and, after negotiating the terms, Joiner accepted. On October 13, over the telephone, both parties agreed to extend the time period for completing and mailing the written contract until October 20.

Although the original paperwork deadline in the offer was October 14, Katz stated he had inserted that provision ‘‘for my purpose only.'' All other provisions of the contract remained unchanged.

Accordingly, Joiner completed the contract and mailed it on October 20. Immediately after, however, Joiner sent Katz a telegram stating that ‘‘I have signed and returned contract, but have changed my mind.

Do not wish to sell property.'' Joiner now claims an oral modification of a contract within the statute of frauds is unenforceable. Katz counters that the modification is not material, and therefore does not affect the underlying contract. Explain who is correct.

Reference no: EM131377949

Questions Cloud

Explain the youth firearms violence initiative : Explain the Youth Firearms Violence Initiative. Choose one of the strategies and tactics. Explain the program in depth and its effectiveness in reducing juvenile weapons crimes.

Explain is wilson correct : Wilson argues that the statute of frauds governs this transaction and that because there was no writing, the contract claim is barred. Is Wilson correct? Explain.

What is the correct interpretation of this contract : A reading of the entire contract, however, indicates that the plan was not intended to apply to someone who was fired for cause. What is the correct interpretation of this contract?

Summarize how shaw-mckay would account for the high crime : Shaw and McKay developed their theory nearly 100 years ago. Do their arguments still apply today? What do the high crime neighborhoods look like now (versus early 1900s Chicago neighborhoods) and does this present any problems for their explanat..

Explain who is correct in given case : Do not wish to sell property.'' Joiner now claims an oral modification of a contract within the statute of frauds is unenforceable. Katz counters that the modification is not material, and therefore does not affect the underlying contract. Explain..

Explain who gets the farm : Donald says this was an oral agreement to sell land, and is unenforceable. The daughter says the letter satisfies the statute of frauds, making the contract enforceable. Who gets the farm? Explain.

Can ganley introduce into evidence oral representations : The contract, however, provided: ‘‘The contractor [Ganley] has examined the said contracts ..., knows all the requirements, and is not relying upon any statement made by the company in respect thereto.'' Can Ganley introduce into evidence the oral..

Discuss the relationship between crime and capitalism : Explain how and why state intervention, labeling, and societal reaction led to unanticipated consequences, according to the labeling theorists.Discuss the relationship between crime and capitalism, as advanced by the radical and new criminological..

Write decision in the given case : Goldberg Company brought action to recover on the basis of $650 per bunch. The evidence showed that there was no applicable custom or usage in the trade and that each party held its belief in good faith. Decision?

User Account

All Pages