Explain unify the bayesian and frequentist approaches

Reference no: EM13153140

There is neither need nor space to go over all of that ground here, but our views are in line with the comments of Fienberg (2006), Kadane (2006), Lad (2006), and OHagan (2006). Over the years, much time and eort has been spent pointing out basic differences between frequentist and Bayesian methods and indicating why Bayesian methods are fundamentally more sound (they condition appropriately, they address the right questions, they provide fully probabilistic statements about both parameters and observables, etc.). Jim Berger has participated actively in this endeavor. Given this eort, why would we want to unify the Bayesian and frequentist approaches? Why should we be interested in the prior that most frequently yields exact frequentist inference, which just leads us to the same place as using frequentist methods, many of which have been found lacking from a Bayesian viewpoint? Why should we care about the frequentist performance of Bayesian methods? Is it not preferable to focus.

Reference no: EM13153140

Questions Cloud

Explain the concentration of nitrogen in the steel : the concentration of nitrogen in the steel at the high-pressure surface is 4 kg/m3. How far into the sheet from this high-pressure side will the concentration be 1.8 kg/m3?

How many kg of mercury could occupy a volume of 500ml : element mercury has a density of 13.6 g/ml. how many kg of mercury could occupy a volume of 500ml?

What is the frequency of the recessive allele : You return to this population after 5 years. Assume that it has reached a point of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (and none of the assumptions of this theorem are violated). What proportion of the population is expected to have at least one recessive ..

Significant difference in the means of the populations : compute the test statistic. at 95% confidence test to determine if the is a significant difference in the means of the 3 populations.

Explain unify the bayesian and frequentist approaches : Given this eort, why would we want to unify the Bayesian and frequentist approaches? Why should we be interested in the prior that most frequently yields exact frequentist inference.

Par value process of accounting for treasury stock : Assuming Kuchman uses the par value method of accounting for its treasury stock, retained earnings at December 31, Year 2 would be reduced by:

How many phenotypic classes would there be in the f2 : If a cross involving one gene with incompletely dominant alleles and another gene with codominant alleles, how many phenotypic classes would there be in the F2?

Immaterial amount of overapplied overhead : In accounting for an immaterial amount of overapplied overhead, which of the following is part of the adjusting entry?

Define that ha does not associate the organic solvent : The extract from solution 3 was found to be 0.0225M in HA. Assume that HA does not associate or dissociate in the organic solvent, calculate

User Account

All Pages