Explain the use of a balloon payment mortgage

Assignment Help Finance Basics

Reference no: EM131227402

Balloon-Payment Mortgage:

Explain the use of a balloon-payment mortgage. Why might a financial institution prefer to offer this type of mortgage?

Reference no: EM131227402

Questions Cloud

What is the resulting loss to the seller from the zoning : The owner sells the property after the announcement but before the rezoning occurs. How much would a buyer pay if she expects to prevail in a claim for compensation with probability .5? What is the resulting loss to the seller from the zoning chan..

Is it efficient for station to locate in residential area : Suppose that a gas station plans to begin operation on a vacant parcel of land located in a residential neighborhood. The extra profit the station will earn at this location compared to its next best location is $500, but it will also impose an ex..

Explain how the use of resilience and coping skills : Describe two behaviors that may be demonstrated by disaffected youth, and explain how each might increase the likelihood that the youth become juvenile victims.

Is it efficient for the land to be developed : What amount of compensation should the developer receive if he is prohibited from developing the land and it is found to be a taking?

Explain the use of a balloon payment mortgage : Explain the use of a balloon-payment mortgage. - Why might a financial institution prefer to offer this type of mortgage?

Why is the 15 year mortgage attractive to homeowners : Why is the 15-year mortgage attractive to homeowners? - Is the interest rate risk to the financial institution higher for a 15-year or a 30- year mortgage? Why?

How caps on arms affect a financial institutions exposure : How does initial rate on adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) differ from rate on fixed-rate mortgages? - How caps on ARMs can affect a financial institution's exposure to interest rate risk.

Evaluate compensation question based on nuisance exception : The case of Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead (369 U.S. 590, 1962) involved a takings claim by the operator of a gravel pit who was prohibited by a town ordinance from continuing to excavate from an open pit that had gone below the water table.

Does this make economic sense : What if the increase in value of the untaken land exceeds the value of the taken land?

User Account

All Pages