Reference no: EM133848325
Assignment:
Based on "When tests are developed formally with psychometric data, norms and research support they are generally published with a manual. Over time the publishers may decide that the test needs revision. This may be to address changes in the constructs that have developed over time, to address limitations that have been articulated over the years of people using the test, to increase external validity and so on (Cronje, Watson & Stoud, 2022). This process is a form of test modification similar to what we are talking about this week. The biggest difference is the extent to which that modification happens formally or informally. Here's an article with some guidelines on test modification. Does this change how you're thinking about our fictional clinic's problem?"
Please continue the discussion with insight to address "You are presently employed as a mental health counsellor within a community health setting in rural Canada. Your funding has been cut for mental health services and your leadership team emphasizes "doing more with less." Consequently, your colleague tells you their idea of creating their own mental health questionnaire for clients which will assess levels of depression, anxiety, and grief based on commonly presented symptoms. They have created their own scoring for each concept. These three conditions are found within your provincial/territorial funding as the main priorities within your geographic area.
You begin to discuss using other assessments that are evidence-based, such as the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS), which your colleagues state is too frustrating for clients and there are often discrepancies between client answers and symptom presentation.
Based on your knowledge from chapters 5 and 6, how can you address this situation using concepts such as reliability, validity, and testing? What are some of the challenges posed by a modified questionnaire as proposed by your colleague?
How might you explain the usage of the DASS-42 or DASS 21 within your setting? Or, how would you support your colleague's decision and what modifications would you suggest?
At least two questions should be answered fully within your posts in the Discussion Boards. The questions are also meant to spark discussion."