Conclusion and written assignment Assignment written in a cohesive manner, by addressing questions directly and comprehensively. Sound and convincing conclusions and judgements drawn from the discussion. Appropriate citation and references given to support the discussion to help draw a sound, well argued conclusion. Assignment written within the word limits. Assignment written in a cohesive manner, by addressing questions directly. Sound and convincing conclusions and judgements drawn from the discussion. Appropriate citation and references given to support the discussion to help draw a sound conclusion. Assignment written within the word limits. Assignment written in a somewhat cohesive manner, by somewhat addressing the questions. Sound conclusion drawn from the discussion. Appropriate citation and references given to support the discussion to help draw a conclusion. Assignment written within the word limits. Assignment written with structure but reads awkwardly. Assignment question answers draw a conclusion but not necessarily drawn from the discussion. Some missing references and citations.

Analysis, evaluation and judgment Analysis and evaluation supported by comprehensive discussion and argument and leading to a supported judgment which addresses the case study questions. Student is able to link analysis with the data - making informed judgment by combining data and theory in coming up with their conclusions. Copious evidence in the work of critical reasoning and synthesis. Analysis and evaluation supported by comprehensive discussion and argument and leading to a clear judgment which addresses the case study questions. Copious evidence in the work of critical reasoning. Analysis and evaluation supported by broad discussion and argument. Much evidence in the work of critical reasoning. Analysis and argument supported in part by some discussion and argument. Some evidence in the work of critical reasoning Analysis and argument not apparent. Lacks argument and discussion. Little or no evidence in the work of critical reasoning

Knowledge, comprehension and application High Distinction In addressing the economic issues, the assignment clearly identifies, defines and critically applies relevant theories and concepts sourced from more than 3 quality sources. Correct graphs and charts are applied and correct analysis is undertaken with reference to the graphs/charts. Distinction In addressing the economic issues in the case study, the assignment 1 clearly identifies, defines and applies relevant theories and concepts sourced from more than 3 quality sources. Correct graphs and charts are used, but minimal explanations are given with reference to the charts Credit In responding to the economic issues in the case study, the assignment defines and applies relevant theories and concepts sourced from at least 3 sources. Pass In responding to the economic issues in the case study, the assignment identifies and defines relevant theories and concepts with little application in response to the case questions. At least 3 sources used in assignment. Limited Key concepts not identified or defined. No, or unclear, application of concepts to the case study. Less than 3 sources used in assignment.

I have attached Assignment information and lecture slides.Please find attached documents - Subject Name: International Economics and Multinational Finance Assessment Title: Assessment 2: Case Study Weighting: 30% Total Marks: 30 Due Date: Monday, Week 9, 11:55am AEST More details on the case study report will be announced during the trimester.