Explain the relevant law relating to the case

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131391118 , Length: word count:2000

Company law Group Assignment and Presentation

Learning Outcomes: On successful completion of this assignment, students will be able to:

Recognise the laws relating to companies in Australia; and,
Examine the duties, rights and responsibilities of company officers.

1. Form a group of 2 students.

2. Select a case below to find, read, understand and present.

3. The length of the written assignment is to be approximately 2000 Words.(Each member of the group must write 1000 words).

4. The written assignment and presentation slides must be in the IRAC method. Maximum 8 slides, and three short points per slide.

5. Each member of the group is to present two parts of the IRAC method (I= issues and facts; Relevant laws and principles; A= Arguments of the parties and analysis, C= conclusion and court outcome).

6. The task is worth a total of 40% of your final marks.

Case Options-

1. Forrest v ASIC (2014)

2. ASIC v Citigroup (2007)

3. Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Sino Australia Oil and Gas Limited (in liq) v Sino Australia Oil and Gas Limited (in liq) [2016] FCA 934 (11 August 2016)

4. Stimpson, in the matter of Eagle Boys Dial-A-Pizza Australia Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) v Eagle Boys Dial-A-Pizza Australia Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2016] FCA 935 (11 August 2016)

5. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v CME Capital Australia Pty Ltd, in the matter of CME Capital Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 544 (16 May 2016)

6. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bilkurra Investments Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 371 (15 April 2016)

7. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Astra Resources PLC [2015] FCA 759 (24 July 2015)

8. ASIC v Soust (2010)

9. North v Marra Developments Ltd (1981)

10. Fame Decorator Agencies Pty Ltd v Jeffries Industries Ltd (1998)

11. Gambotto v WCP Ltd (1995)

12. Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1990)

13. Permanent Trustee Australia Ltd (as Trustee of Advance Property Fund) v Stout and Others (1999)

14. Nassar v Innovative Precasters Group Pty Ltd (2009)

15. McGellin v Mount King Mining NL (1998)

16. Beck v Weinstock (2013)

17. Kinsela v Russell Kinsela Pty Ltd (in liq) (1986)

18. ASIC v Hellicar (2012)

19. ASIC v Lindberg (2012)

20. Shafron v ASIC (2012)

21. ASIC v Healey (2011)

22. Vines v ASIC (2006)

23. ASIC v Adler (2002)

24. Brunninghausen v Glavanics(1999)

25. ASIC v Rich (2003)

26. ASIC v Parker (2003)

27. ASIC v Loiterton (2004)

28. ASIC v PFS Business Development Group Pty Ltd (2006)

29. Hall v Poolman (2007)

30. ASIC v Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd (No. 2) (2005)

31. State of South Australia v Marcus Clark (1996)

32. ASIC v Vizard (2005)

33. ASIC v McDonald (No.11) (2009)

34. ASIC v NRMA (2002)

35. ASIC v Plymin (2003)

36. ASIC v Cyclone Magnetic Engines Inc (2010)

37. ASC v MacLeod (2000)

38. Biodiesel Producers Ltd v Stewart (2007)

39. AXA Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd v Direct Share Purchasing Corporation Pty Ltd (2009)

40. Wilson v Manna Hill Mining Corporation Pty Ltd (2004)

41. Wenzel v ASX Ltd (2002)

42. R v Rivkin (2004)

43. Kwok v R (2007)

44. Isak Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Faress (2003)

45. Capricornia Credit Union Ltd v ASIC (2007)

Written Assignment:

Identify the facts of the case.

Explain the relevant law relating to the case.

Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case.

Summarise the judgement of the case.

Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal.

Reference no: EM131391118

Questions Cloud

Discuss different types of bariatric : Discuss different types of bariatric (weight-loss) surgery, applications for each and considerations before electing for surgical weight-loss intervention.

Analyze the steps involved in preparing a cash budget : Analyze the steps involved in preparing a cash budget and determine which step(s) presents the greatest number of obstacles to the greatest number of small businesses. Explain your rationale.

Compare and contrast mitosis and meiosis : Question 1. Compare and contrast mitosis and meiosis (include at least 3 comparisons and 3 differences).

Discuss whether private industry now has a responsibility : Clearly discuss whether private industry now has a responsibility to protect national security through implementing good cybersecurity controls imposed by government regulation.

Explain the relevant law relating to the case : BBAL401 Company law Group Assignment and Presentation. Written Assignment: Identify the facts of the case. Explain the relevant law relating to the case. Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case

What is its grid location and part number : Its low-order address is multiplexed like the 68HC11 in Problem 17-30. What IC and control signal are used to demultiplex the address/data bus (AD0-AD7) into the low-order address bus (A0-A7)?

Create class account with id balance person and datecreated : Create class Account with id, balance, Person, and dateCreated. Use a static class variable to store the annualInterestRate for all account holders. Provide constructors, setter and getter for the Account class.

Directly causes what form of heart disease : If the muscle tissues of the heart are deprived of oxygen too long, the cells begin to die. This directly causes what form of heart disease?

Define your companys target market : For most non-alcoholic beverages, marketing (as opposed to the actual product itself) is key to success. Cola drinks, for example, are fairly undifferentiated, as are many energy drinks, juices, bottled water, and the like. Companies producing the..

Reviews

len1391118

2/11/2017 4:13:56 AM

At all times: the group was cohesive and courteous; the oral presentations were clear and understandable; the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; engaging; the presentation slides were logical and structured; and the oral presentations were interesting and engaging. All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed with reference to cases with similar facts. All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed, and the Act and related cases are referenced and discussed. All the legal argumentsare clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis withthe relevant law. The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.

2/11/2017 4:13:48 AM

Australian Student, 2000 words and 8 slides, make sure slide is not copy-paste from assignment directly. Attached is the assignment guideline of a case study. Our case study is the first one that is, Forrest V ASIC (2014). ASIC = Australian Securities & Investment Commision. but it has to be of the given year 2014. I need to be followed by IRAC method. and in Rules & Relevant laws, sections has to be mentioned properly from Corporations Act 2001. Its a very important thing otherwise we will loose marks. One more thing, last time I consulted australia tutor for business law assignment and it was not properly followed by IRAC method and there were some significant things missing that lost my marks. It’s a request that please consider the guidelines properly especially IRAC method, and mentioning correct sections (section number and statement) from Corporations Act 2001.

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

User Account

All Pages