Reference no: EM131114665 , Length:
Learning Outcomes:
- Recognise the laws relating to companies in Australia; and
- Examine the duties, rights and responsibilities of company officers
1. Select a case below to find, read, understand and present.
2. The length of the written assignment is to be approximately 2000 Words.
3. The written assignment and presentation slides must be in the IRAC method. Maximum 8 slides, and three short points per slide.
4. Present two parts of the IRAC method (I= issues and facts; Relevant laws and principles; A= Arguments of the parties and analysis, C= conclusion and court outcome).
You see a list of cases, my case assignment is 24. Hall v Poolman. Along with the case there's instructions written at the start, about how the assignment should be done and what information should be included.
Assignment should be in the format of IRAC method.
Case Options
1. Forrest v ASIC (2014)
2. ASIC v Citigroup (2007)
3. ASIC v Soust (2010)
4. North v Marra Developments Ltd (1981)
5. Fame Decorator Agencies Pty Ltd v Jeffries Industries Ltd (1998)
6. Gambotto v WCP Ltd (1995)
7. Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1990)
8. Permanent Trustee Australia Ltd (as Trustee of Advance Property Fund) v Stout and Others (1999)
9. Nassar v Innovative Precasters Group Pty Ltd (2009)
10. McGellin v Mount King Mining NL (1998)
11. Beck v Weinstock (2013)
12. Kinsela v Russell Kinsela Pty Ltd (in liq) (1986)
13. ASIC v Hellicar (2012)
14. ASIC v Lindberg (2012)
15. Shafron v ASIC (2012)
16. ASIC v Healey (2011)
17. Vines v ASIC (2006)
18. ASIC v Adler (2002)
19. Brunninghausen v Glavanics (1999)
20. ASIC v Rich (2003)
21. ASIC v Parker (2003)
22. ASIC v Loiterton (2004)
23. ASIC v PFS Business Development Group Pty Ltd (2006)
24. Hall v Poolman (2007)
25. ASIC v Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd (No. 2) (2005)
26. State of South Australia v Marcus Clark (1996)
27. ASIC v Vizard (2005)
28. ASIC v McDonald (No.11) (2009)
29. ASIC v NRMA (2002)
30. ASIC v Plymin (2003)
31. ASIC v Cyclone Magnetic Engines Inc (2010)
32. ASC v MacLeod (2000)
33. Biodiesel Producers Ltd v Stewart (2007)
34. AXA Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd v Direct Share Purchasing Corporation Pty Ltd (2009)
35. Wilson v Manna Hill Mining Corporation Pty Ltd (2004)
36. Wenzel v ASX Ltd (2002)
37. R v Rivkin (2004)
38. Kwok v R (2007)
39. Isak Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Faress (2003)
40. Capricornia Credit Union Ltd v ASIC (2007)
Assignment:
Identify the facts of the case
Explain the relevant law relating to the case
Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case
Summarise the judgement of the case
Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal.
|
Develop a solid hypothesis
: 2 Page Essay. APA Format. Please write an introduction and conclusion paragraph. The case study can be found at the link below. The directions for the case study are also listed below. Develop a solid hypothesis. Provide evidence from the case, in..
|
|
Can you find out the sample size underlying these results
: Can you find out the sample size underlying these results?
|
|
Why would an employee seek a downward move
: Which act permits a lower training wage, which employers may pay to workers under the age of 20 fora period of up to 90 days?
|
|
Interventions to implement first
: Anderson lists a number of considerations in choosing the right intervention strategy ion Chapter 9. In your view, how might you prioritize these? What do you think are the most important considerations in choosing which interventions to implement..
|
|
Explain the relevant law relating to the case
: Company law - BBAL401 - Explain the relevant law relating to the case and discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case and summarise the judgement of the case
|
|
Calculating the gdp for the united states
: If a country is not specified, you can assume the action is performed in the United States.
|
|
Find all laurent expansions centered
: Find all Laurent expansions centered at i of the function f(z) = 1/z2-z. For each expansion, indicate the largest open set on which it converges
|
|
Everyday management practices
: Compare and contrast data, information, learning, knowledge, and knowledge management. How important are these distinctions to everyday management practices?
|
|
Team to function effectively and efficiently
: 1. The stage of a team's life cycle when norms are established that enable the team to function effectively and efficiently. 2. Allows managers to know exactly who they report to and give directives to.
|