Reference no: EM133230685
Use the portal below to submit your response to the following prompt:
Question 1- Define and explain the parts of an argument and how they relate.
Question 2-Then, analyze the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning.
Question 3- Make sure your description involves the terms we use to evaluate inductive vs deductive reasoning (i.e., valid, sound, strong, cogent) and explain the meanings of these terms.
Question 4- Next, tell what it means for an argument to be fallacious. Give a specific example of a fallacy you learned about in this module as it applies to a hypothetical scenario.
Question 5- Finally, give brief arguments for why you think logic can be a) helpful and b) harmful to individuals and/or society. Don't forget to cite examples or give supporting premises.
Your response should be at least four paragraphs. As in all academic writing, make sure you stick to one topic/point per paragraph.
|
Can moral principles be universal
: PHILOSOPHY 123 University of Houston, Can you discuss the theory that is connected to the above topic, giving specific support by its theorists?
|
|
Identify a specific word or term that needs to be defined
: Identify a specific word or term that needs to be defined further. Begin asking questions to clarify the meaning or intent. Keep this up as long as you can
|
|
What is classicism in cognitive science
: What is Classicism in cognitive science? What is the essential difference between classical and non-classical forms of representation? How does this matter
|
|
What are three physical changes that happen to teen brains
: What are three physical changes that happen to teen brains that make it difficult for someone like Gary to weigh risk and reward
|
|
Explain the parts of an argument and how they relate
: PHI 2600 Valencia College, Define and explain the parts of an argument and how they relate and analyze the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning
|
|
Explain why that part of the system needs improving
: PSY 580-0500 Grand Canyon University, Describe the methodology you would use, how you would select participants, the number of participants and any assumptions
|
|
Calculate a confidence interval for the data set
: Calculate a 95% and 99% confidence interval for the following data set. Note: this is a sample. Show your steps including the mean
|
|
What philosophical methods are you going to use
: PHILOSOPHY 2240 York University, what philosophical methods are you going to use? Apply 1 method that is not yet mentioned in your answer in the previous
|
|
Do you try to get her in the study that would get her
: PHIL 1100 Memorial University of Newfoundland, State what school of thought you are choosing for each (Virtue ethics, Deontology, Social Contract
|