Explain the majority makes about a national consensus

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM133401055

Assignment:

We're discussing limitations on the criminal law including constitutional limitations on sentencing. This includes constitutional limitations like the prohibition on cruel and unusual sentences. Before seeing these cases, did you think there should be limitations (for example, severity or federal versus state)? If you thought there should be limitations what should there be (severity or federal versus state)? Do these cases put limitations like this? Are they strong, medium or small? What do you think of the limitations?

Explain why the dissent discusses the convenience store hypothetical at page 71 in Kennedy v. Louisiana?

What is the holding of Kennedy v. Louisiana? Explain the argument the majority makes about a "national consensus" and why it would help or hurt the majority's position.

Explain the holding in Ewing v. California. See page 80. What do you think about the result? What is the most important basis for the holding?

List the arguments made by the dissent and respond to them.

Reference no: EM133401055

Questions Cloud

Example of disproportionate minority contact : Summary of an article or event that is an example of disproportionate minority contact (DMC) with police.

How people behaved when these norms were broken : How people behaved when these norms were broken? Did the subject(s) involved (friends or strangers) affect the outcome?

Characteristics may be present in the future mass murderer : What are potential pedigree characteristics may be present in the future mass murderer?

Do you feel hinder ics ability to operate at full potential : These Executive Orders contribute to the success of the Intelligence Community or do you feel they hinder the IC's ability to operate at its full potential?

Explain the majority makes about a national consensus : Explain the argument the majority makes about a "national consensus" and why it would help or hurt the majority's position.

Do you think drew killed his wife katheleen savio : Do you think Drew killed his wife Katheleen Savio? List two reasons why or why not.

Describe an affirmative defense : Under Michigan Law, describe the 3 part test to determine the defense of Legal Insanity. What is Guilty But Mentally Ill?

Discuss about social order cross-culturally : Can you think of examples from your own life that support Roberts' conclusions about social order cross-culturally?

What are the primary agendas of international conventions : How would you describe the differences between conventions and treaties passed before and after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack?

User Account

All Pages