Explain the logic that supported the court decision

Assignment Help HR Management

Reference no: EM132489525

Assignment: Individual Paper- Each student will choose three cases, each from a different chapter, from the readings in weeks 3 and 4 (Chapters 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). No students on a team will choose the same cases and there should be no duplicate cases. A Reference page should be provided. (100 points)

• Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit, you need to use the material from the week's lectures, text and/or discussions when responding to the questions.

• Utilize the case format below:

1. Read and understand the case. Show your Analysis and Reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. Dedicate at least one sub-heading to each following outline topic:

• Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case]

• Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns]

• Explain the applicable law(s). Use the textbook here. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers.

• Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?]

• Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court's decision]

2. Dedicate 1 sub-heading to each of the case questions immediately following the case. First, restate the question and then fully answer.

3. Conclusion. This should summarize the key aspects of the decision and also your recommendations on the court's ruling

4. Include citations and a reference page with your sources. Use APA style citations and references.

Chapter 7: National Origin Discrimination
case 1 chapter seven Garcia Vs Spun Steak

Chapter 8: Gender Discrimination
case 1 chapter 8 Wedow v. City of Kansas City, Missouri

Chapter 11: Religious Discrimination
case 2 chapter 11 Chalmers v. Tulon Company of Richmond

Please use this cases for the project.

Reference no: EM132489525

Questions Cloud

Why should compensation systems be equitable : Does money motivate employees? Why or Why not? Why should compensation systems be equitable? How can an organization design an equitable compensation system?

What is ecology and how does it relate to microbes : What is ecology and how does it relate to microbes, what are some of the subcategories that can be studied regarding this field?

Compute the ending balance of each account : Post each transaction to T-accounts and compute the ending balance of each account. The beginning balance of each account before the transactions

How to perform discharge analysis for patient information : A procedure is defined as a series of written steps in chronological order that detail the manner of performing work. We rely on procedures within a Health.

Explain the logic that supported the court decision : Read and understand the case. Show your Analysis and Reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts.

How did wigand show moral intelligence in the situation : How did Dr. Wigand show moral intelligence in this situation? Jeffrey Wigand put his economic future as well as coworkers and his family at risk to expose.

Mgt101 principles of management assignment problem : MGT101 Principles of Management assignment help and solutions, Saudi Electronic University, assessment help - What are the biggest challenges Norwegian.

How would application of such a model improve training : Donald Kirkpatrick's Four level Evaluation Model, devised in the 1970s and a standard tool in training circles Evaluate the value and limitations of the model.

What are the advantages for drawing shop workers : What are the advantages and disadvantages for drawing at least some of the shop workers from existing staff? How would you create job descriptions.

User Account

All Pages