Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133770216

Assignment: Needs Analysis for Change

As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization's outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.

Instructions

Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

Overall, you will be assessed on the following criteria:

A. Summarize your chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

a. Reiterate your rationale for pursuing this issue, as well as the gap contributing to it that you identified in your previous assessment.

B. Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.

a. Use at least one piece of evidence to support this disparity (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resources).

C. Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.

a. For example, if your implementation plan includes the need for increased staffing, you might want to research errors or patient falls that occurred as a result of high patient and low staff ratio in the literature.

Reference no: EM133770216

Questions Cloud

How would you respond and what would be your rationale : Your family does not believe in the death penalty regardless of the crime. How would you respond and what would be your rationale for the choice you made?

Apply ethical decision-making strategies : The Kalief Browder case Explain how would respond to the situation and how to apply ethical decision-making strategies in a similar situation.

How to integrate the principles into your vision for career : Include a discussion of how to integrate these principles into your vision for your career once you have completed your master's degree.

Stages of the design thinking process : The use of this data is mandatory for demonstrating application of course concepts - response through application of the analytics concepts

Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources : Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.

Creating outcomes for your nominated personal : Demonstrating how this data can be used as input to the "Empathise" or "Discovery" stages of the Design Thinking process - Applying user journey mapping

Understands successful leaders distribute leadership : The school principal understands successful leaders distribute leadership by valuing diverse viewpoints, motivating staff, and increasing communication

How could you correct any of the bias : Consider what you want or suspect the answer will be- are you cherry picking to get that result? If so, how could you correct any of this bias?

Describe your supervision experience : Describe your supervision experience, including type of organizations, and areas of responsibility that align with the competencies and qualifications

User Account

All Pages