Reference no: EM132988090

uestions -

Q1) Explain the definition of the audit expectation gap? Then, discuss some approaches to reducing the expectation gap.

Q2) The audit partner has just advised you that he has been approached to accept the appointment of auditor to Bungie Limited. Bungie Limited is a manufacturer of gaming machines and has been named in a recent anti-corruption enquiry as having offered incentives to state government members to support a proposed bill that would allow an increased number of gaming machines in licensed premises. No charges have yet been laid against Bungie Limited or any of its employees. The audit partner explains to you that Bungie Limited's auditors were re-appointed for the current financial year at the Annual General Meeting held two months ago. However, Bungie Limited's managing director is unhappy with the existing auditing firm as the audit partner assigned to Bungie Limited has been changed.

Required - The audit partner is unsure whether he should accept the appointment and has asked you to outline any ethical, legal, and other factors to consider in his decision about whether to accept the appointment for the current year and indicate the steps that need to be taken prior to the appointment.

Q3) You have reviewed the work performed by your assistant, Samson Chow, on the audit of Bexca Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2018 and have noted the following two independent matters:

(i) In testing investments in listed securities, Samson selected all shareholdings with a market value above $200,000 and checked them to the closing market value reported by the Australian Stock Exchange to determine the net realisable value of each shareholding. The items tested totalled $5,500,000, or 60% of the total balance. Of the items tested, only one error of $110,000 was discovered. Samson concluded that the error was not itself material, as only 2% of the balance was tested. He extrapolated this error to the total population and estimated that the error for the total population would be $185,000, which was also immaterial. Therefore, he concluded that the investments in listed securities were fairly stated at the lower of cost or net realisable value.

(ii) Bexca Ltd has 1,000 stock lines that are maintained on a perpetual inventory system. Stock is counted on a cyclical basis so that all lines are covered at least once per year. Samson attended the March stocktake to observe the counting procedures and conducted 20 test counts from the floor to the client's count sheets and 20 from the client's count sheets to the floor. He uncovered two minor discrepancies of one item each, which he considered to be immaterial. The client also uncovered five minor discrepancies between the perpetual records and the actual quantity on hand. None of these discrepancies was adjusted on the perpetual records, as the amounts involved only totalled $50,000 and were considered to be immaterial. Samson concluded that no further work was considered necessary on stock quantities at year-end.

Required -

(a) Explain what is meant by sufficient appropriate audit evidence.

(b) Explain whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained for each of the above situations. Give reasons for your answer.