Reference no: EM132740843
Case Description
High Tech Engineering (HTE) is a 50-year-old family-owned manufacturing company with 250 employees that produces small parts for the aircraft industry. The president of HTE is Harold Barelli, who came to the company from a smaller business with strong credentials as a leader in advanced aircraft technology. Before Harold, the only other president of HTE was the founder and owner of the company. The organizational structure at HTE was very traditional, and it was supported by a very rich organizational culture.
As the new president, Harold sincerely wanted to transform HTE. He wanted to prove that new technologies and advanced management techniques could make HTE one of the best manufacturing companies in the country. To that end, Harold created a vision statement that was displayed throughout the company. The two-page statement, which had a strong democratic tone, described the overall purposes, directions, and values of the company.
During the first 3 years of Harold's tenure as president, several major reorganizations took place at the company. These were designed by Harold and a select few of his senior managers. The intention of each reorganization was to implement advanced organizational structures to bolster the declared HTE vision.
Yet the major outcome of each of the changes was to dilute the leadership and create a feeling of instability among the employees. Most of the changes were made from the top down, with little input from lower or middle management. Some of the changes gave employees more control in circumstances where they needed less, whereas other changes limited employee input in contexts where employees should have been given more input. Rather than feeling comfortable in their various roles at HTE, employees began to feel uncertain about their responsibilities and how they contributed to stated goals of the company. The overall effect of the reorganizations was a precipitous drop in worker morale and production.
Harold claimed to be democratic in his style of leadership, but he was arbitrary in how he treated people. He acted in a nondirective style toward some people, and he showed arbitrary control toward others. He wanted to be seen as a hands-on manager, but he delegated operational control of the company to others while he focused on external customer relations and matters of the board of directors.
At times Harold appeared to be insensitive to employees' concerns. He wanted HTE to be an environment in which everyone could feel empowered, but he often failed to listen closely to what employees were saying. He seldom engaged in open, two-way communication. HTE had a long, rich history with many unique stories, but the employees felt that Harold either misunderstood or did not care about that history.
Four years after arriving at HTE, Harold stepped down as president after his operations officer ran the company into a large debt and cash-flow crisis. His dream of building HTE into a world-class manufacturing company was never realized.
Questions
1. Explain the problems and obstacles related to implementation Harold encountered in implementing his vision.
2. Analyze the sources of power and influence Harold got in this case.
3. Discuss the reasons why employees resist the changes introduced by Harold.
4. Discuss the methods Harold could use to minimize resistance to change.
5. Explain the best strategies Harold could use in communicating with employees.
6. Explain the best strategies Harold could use to motivate employees to accept the change.
What is the most critical merger or acquisition
: What is the most critical merger or acquisition that has contributed to Caterpillar's performance and success in achieving organizational goals?
|
Find what is yield to call of a year to maturity bond
: Find What is yield to call of a 20 year to maturity bond that pays a coupon rate of 8.02% per year, has a $1,000 par value, and is currently priced at $1,026?
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of caterpillar operational plan
: Evaluate the effectiveness of Caterpillar's operational plan for global strategies (international, multi-domestic, global-standardization, or transnational).
|
What is the optimum production plan for the company
: The unit contribution margin is, respectively, $110 for the Model A and $175 for the Model B. What is the optimum production plan for the company
|
Explain the best strategies harold use in communication
: High Tech Engineering (HTE) is a 50-year-old family-owned manufacturing company with 250 employees that produces small parts for the aircraft industry.
|
How many pairs of skis should order in december
: Ending inventory at the end of any given month, and Adriana always adheres to this policy, how many pairs of skis should she order in December?
|
Prepare the journal entries to record the replacement
: On 1 January 2020, BNB purchased a new equipment, Prepare the journal entries to record the replacement and depreciation of the equipment on 1 January 2020
|
What is Roger margin of safety in units
: Roger Corp. planned to sell 22,600 products. Total fixed costs were expected to be $12,143,000. What is Roger margin of safety in units
|
How do calculate the amount of the loss recorded on the sale
: Calculate the amount of the loss recorded on the sale. The machine was assigned a residual value of $6,230 and an expected life
|