Reference no: EM133346332
Question: In "An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding" Hume states the following regarding the principle of causation: "When we look about us towards external objects, and consider the operation of causes, we are never able, in a single instance, to discover any power or necessary
connexion [sic]; any quality, which binds the effect to the cause, and renders the one an infallible consequence of the other. We only find, that the one does actually, in fact, follow the other. The impulse of one billiard-ball is attended with motion in the second. This is the whole that appears to the outward senses. The mind feels no sentiment or inward impression from this succession of objects: Consequently, there is not, in any single, particular instance of cause and effect, anything which can suggest the idea of power or necessary connexion"
Explain the bases of Hume's critique of the idea of causation in relation to the quote. Name and evaluate the four conditions that Hume claims are necessary, paying particular attention to the ideas of "constant conjunction" and "necessary connexion."How is Kant's philosophy of causation different from Hume's; and why is Kant claims that the connexion between cause and effect cannot be an object of experience and therefore cannot be validated by experience